Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: results from a randomised controlled exploratory trial

被引:67
|
作者
Bruhn, Hanne [1 ]
Bond, Christine M. [2 ]
Elliott, Alison M. [2 ]
Hannaford, Philip C. [2 ]
Lee, Amanda J. [3 ]
McNamee, Paul [4 ]
Smith, Blair H. [5 ]
Watson, Margaret C. [2 ]
Holland, Richard [6 ]
Wright, David [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Ctr Healthcare Randomised Trials, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Div Appl Hlth Sci, Ctr Acad Primary Care, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Div Appl Hlth Sci, Med Stat Team, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Econ Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
[5] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Div Populat Hlth Sci, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[6] Univ E Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[7] Univ E Anglia, Sch Pharm, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2013年 / 3卷 / 04期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Pain Management; Primary Care; OUTCOME DOMAINS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; COMMUNITY; MEDICATION; HEALTH; RECOMMENDATIONS; IDENTIFICATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; LIFE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002361
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare the effectiveness of pharmacist medication review, with or without pharmacist prescribing, with standard care, for patients with chronic pain. Design An exploratory randomised controlled trial. Setting Six general practices with prescribing pharmacists in Grampian (3) and East Anglia (3). Participants Patients on repeat prescribed pain medication (4815) were screened by general practitioners (GPs), and mailed invitations (1397). 196 were randomised and 180 (92%) completed. Exclusion criteria included: severe mental illness, terminally ill, cancer related pain, history of addiction. Randomisation and intervention Patients were randomised using a remote telephone service to: (1) pharmacist medication review with face-to-face pharmacist prescribing; (2) pharmacist medication review with feedback to GP and no planned patient contact or (3) treatment as usual (TAU). Blinding was not possible. Outcome measures Outcomes were the SF-12v2, the Chronic Pain Grade (CPG), the Health Utilities Index 3 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Outcomes were collected at 0, 3 and 6months. Results In the prescribing arm (n=70) two patients were excluded/nine withdrew. In the review arm (n=63) one was excluded/three withdrew. In the TAU arm (n=63) four withdrew. Compared with baseline, patients had an improved CPG in the prescribing arm, 47.7% (21/44; p=0.003) and in the review arm, 38.6% (17/44; p=0.001), but not the TAU group, 31.3% (15/48; ns). The SF-12 Physical Component Score showed no effect in the prescribing or review arms but improvement in TAU (p=0.02). The SF-12 Mental Component Score showed no effect for the prescribing or review arms and deterioration in the TAU arm (p=0.002). HADS scores improved within the prescribing arm for depression (p=0.022) and anxiety (p=0.007), between groups (p=0.022 and p=0.045, respectively). Conclusions This is the first randomised controlled trial of pharmacist prescribing in the UK, and suggests that there may be a benefit for patients with chronic pain. A larger trial is required.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: costs and benefits in a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Neilson, Aileen R.
    Bruhn, Hanne
    Bond, Christine M.
    Elliott, Alison M.
    Smith, Blair H.
    Hannaford, Philip C.
    Holland, Richard
    Lee, Amanda J.
    Watson, Margaret
    Wright, David
    McNamee, Paul
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (04):
  • [2] PHARMACIST-LED MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN IN PRIMARY CARE: THE PIPPC STUDY
    Bruhn, H.
    Blyth, A.
    Elliott, A.
    Hannaford, P.
    Holland, R.
    Lee, A.
    MacNamee, P.
    Smith, B.
    Watson, M.
    Wright, D.
    Bond, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2011, 65
  • [3] Pharmacist-led Statin Outreach Support (SOS): cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care
    Lowrie, R.
    Morrison, J.
    Lloyd, S.
    Mcconnachie, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 318 - 318
  • [4] Pharmacist-Led Chronic Care Management Services
    Yuet, Wei C.
    Gardea, Jessica
    Ebert, Didi
    Martin, Randy D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (05) : 465 - 465
  • [5] Financial performance and reimbursemen of pharmacist-led chronic care management
    Martin, Randy
    Tram, Kathlynn
    Le, Lan
    Simmons, Crystal
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2020, 77 (23) : 1973 - 1979
  • [6] A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of a Pharmacist-Led Collaborative Intervention to Improve Statin Prescribing and Attainment of Cholesterol Targets in Primary Care
    Lowrie, Richard
    Lloyd, Suzanne M.
    McConnachie, Alex
    Morrison, Jill
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):
  • [7] Pharmacist-led medication review in patients over 65: a randomized, controlled trial in primary care
    Krska, J
    Cromarty, JA
    Arris, F
    Jamieson, D
    Hansford, D
    Duffus, PRS
    Downie, G
    Seymour, DG
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2001, 30 (03) : 205 - 211
  • [8] Developing the pharmacist role in the management of hypertension in primary care: experience from two pharmacist-led clinics
    Williams, Helen
    Desai, Usha
    Dallmeyer, Rebecca
    [J]. PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2009, 31 (02): : 253 - 253
  • [9] Pharmacist-led medication reviews in primary care
    Desborough, J. A.
    Twigg, M. J.
    [J]. REVIEWS IN CLINICAL GERONTOLOGY, 2014, 24 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [10] A primary care-based, pharmacist-led, disease management program improves outcomes for patients with diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
    Rothman, RL
    Pignone, MP
    Malone, R
    Bryant, B
    DeWalt, DA
    Crigler, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 18 : 155 - 155