Exploring the prognostic and therapeutic utility of expanded mutation profiling in appendix peritoneal metastasis managed with CRS/HIPEC

被引:6
|
作者
Zhang, Chunmeng [1 ]
Plambeck, Benjamin D. [1 ]
Craig, Margaret E. [1 ]
Tu, Alexander [1 ]
Mikus, Ryan J. [1 ]
Shostrom, Valerie [2 ]
McDermott, Sean P. [1 ]
Igbinigie, Ikponmwosa [1 ]
Brown, Krista [3 ]
Cushman-Vokoun, Allison [4 ]
Foster, Jason M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Omaha, NE USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, Omaha, NE USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, Omaha, NE USA
[4] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
appendix; carcinomatosis; HIPEC; mutations; peritoneal metastasis; survival;
D O I
10.1002/jso.26439
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction Interrogation of cancers with next-generation sequencing (NGS) mutation panels has become widely utilized, identifying prognostic and actionable mutations. This study explored the value of expanded mutation analysis in appendix peritoneal metastases (APM). Methods Forty-eight APM patients treated 2013-2018 were retrospectively collected from a registry. Fifty-gene NGS analysis was performed in CLIA approved lab to obtain mutation profiles. All patients underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS)/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with mitomycin C. Peritoneal cancer index (PCI), optimal CRS, survival (overall survival [OS] and progression-free survival [PFS]) data were collected. Survival analyses were performed on all APM, high-grade (HG), and low grade (LG) subsets, evaluating the impact of specific mutations on the outcome. Results Eighty-three percent of APM had a mutation identified. KRAS was most frequent, 65% (88% LG 42% HG) with GNAS identified in 92% of LG-APM. SMAD4 and/or TP53 mutations occurred in 25% of APM with observed decreased OS (46 vs. 81 months p = .0029); worse in HG-APM (26 vs. 49 months p = .0451). SMAD4 was associated with the most significant reduction in PFS in APM (p = .0085). Actionable mutations were identified in 73% of APM patients. Conclusions Most frequent mutations were KRAS, TP53, and SMAD4, and actionable mutation detection was common. SMAD4 and TP53 were associated with decreased OS. NGS mutation profiling has potential utility in APM.
引用
收藏
页码:1599 / 1609
页数:11
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Expanded Mutation Profiling in Appendix Peritoneal Metastasis has a Prognostic and Therapeutic Utility When Managed with Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
    Zhang, C.
    Plambeck, B.
    Tu, A.
    Brown, K.
    Foster, J. M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : S83 - S84
  • [2] The incidence and prognostic importance of ovarian involvement in patients with peritoneal metastasis undergoing CRS-HIPEC
    Madonia, D.
    Graf, W.
    Ghanipour, L.
    EJSO, 2022, 48 (03): : 666 - 671
  • [3] Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC
    Graf, Wilhelm
    Cashin, Peter H.
    Ghanipour, Lana
    Enblad, Malin
    Botling, Johan
    Terman, Alexei
    Birgisson, Helgi
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (01) : 293 - 300
  • [4] Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC
    Wilhelm Graf
    Peter H. Cashin
    Lana Ghanipour
    Malin Enblad
    Johan Botling
    Alexei Terman
    Helgi Birgisson
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 293 - 300
  • [5] ASO Author Reflections: Palliative Management of Peritoneal Metastasis Exploring the Risks and Benefits of CRS/HIPEC, a Distinctly Different Context Than Early CRS/HIPEC Intervention With 'Curative Intent'
    Foster, Jason M.
    Zhang, Chunmeng
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (05) : 3347 - 3348
  • [6] ASO Author Reflections: Palliative Management of Peritoneal Metastasis Exploring the Risks and Benefits of CRS/HIPEC, a Distinctly Different Context Than Early CRS/HIPEC Intervention With ‘Curative Intent’
    Jason M. Foster
    Chunmeng Zhang
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 3347 - 3348
  • [7] Novel Prognostic Scoring System for Prediction of Survival Outcomes in Patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis
    Chin, K.
    Tan, G.
    Chia, C.
    Ong, J. C.
    Teo, M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : S114 - S115
  • [8] Prognostic Impact and Utility of Immunoprofiling in the Selection of Patients with Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis for Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)
    Mary Garland-Kledzik
    Abhineet Uppal
    Yalda B. Naeini
    Stacey Stern
    Richard Erali
    Anthony J. Scholer
    Adam M. Khader
    Juan A. Santamaria-Barria
    Kathleen Cummins-Perry
    Yi Zhou
    Konstantinos I. Votanopoulos
    Perry Shen
    Edward A. Levine
    Anton J. Bilchik
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2021, 25 : 233 - 240
  • [9] Prognostic Impact and Utility of Immunoprofiling in the Selection of Patients with Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis for Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)
    Garland-Kledzik, Mary
    Uppal, Abhineet
    Naeini, Yalda B.
    Stern, Stacey
    Erali, Richard
    Scholer, Anthony J.
    Khader, Adam M.
    Santamaria-Barria, Juan A.
    Cummins-Perry, Kathleen
    Zhou, Yi
    Votanopoulos, Konstantinos, I
    Shen, Perry
    Levine, Edward A.
    Bilchik, Anton J.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (01) : 233 - 240