Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century

被引:208
|
作者
Dorninger, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Hornborg, Alf [3 ]
Abson, David J. [1 ]
von Wehrden, Henrik [1 ]
Schaffartzik, Anke [4 ,5 ]
Giljum, Stefan [6 ]
Engler, John-Oliver [1 ]
Feller, Robert L. [1 ,7 ]
Hubacek, Klaus [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Wieland, Hanspeter [6 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Univ Sallee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
[2] Konrad Lorenz Inst Evolut & Cognit Res, Martinstr 12, A-3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria
[3] Lund Univ, Human Ecol Div, Solvegatan 10, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
[4] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Ciancia & Tecnol Ambientals ICTA, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[5] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Social Ecol, Schottenfeldgasse 2, A-1070 Vienna, Austria
[6] Vienna Univ Econ & Business WU, Inst Ecol Econ, Welthandelspl 1, A-1020 Vienna, Austria
[7] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Biol Sci, Tillydrone Ave, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, Scotland
[8] Univ Groningen, Energy & Sustainabil Res Inst Groningen, Ctr Energy & Environm Sci, Nijenborgh 6, NL-9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands
[9] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[10] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Schlosspl 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Ecologically unequal exchange; Embodied trade flows; Environmentally-extended multi-regional input-output analysis; International inequality; International trade; Structural equation model; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE; SOUTH-AMERICA; LAND SYSTEM; INPUT; FOOTPRINTS; CONSUMPTION; EMISSIONS; ECONOMY; EORA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106824
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecologically unequal exchange theory posits asymmetric net flows of biophysical resources from poorer to richer countries. To date, empirical evidence to support this theoretical notion as a systemic aspect of the global economy is largely lacking. Through environmentally-extended multi-regional input-output modelling, we provide empirical evidence for ecologically unequal exchange as a persistent feature of the global economy from 1990 to 2015. We identify the regions of origin and final consumption for four resource groups: materials, energy, land, and labor. By comparing the monetary exchange value of resources embodied in trade, we find significant international disparities in how resource provision is compensated. Value added per ton of raw material embodied in exports is 11 times higher in high-income countries than in those with the lowest income, and 28 times higher per unit of embodied labor. With the exception of embodied land for China and India, all other world regions serve as net exporters of all types of embodied resources to high-income countries across the 1990-2015 time period. On aggregate, ecologically unequal exchange allows high-income countries to simultaneously appropriate resources and to generate a monetary surplus through international trade. This has far-reaching implications for global sustainability and for the economic growth prospects of nations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条