共 50 条
Digital Interventions to Support Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Systematic Review
被引:60
|作者:
McCann, Lisa
[1
]
McMillan, Kathryn Anne
[1
]
Pugh, Gemma
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Digital Hlth & Wellness Grp, Livingstone Tower,16 Richmond St, Glasgow G1 1XQ, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Sports & Exercise Med, William Harvey Res Inst, London, England
来源:
关键词:
adolescent;
neoplasms;
telemedicine;
systematic review;
eHealth;
PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY INTERVENTION;
PROVIDE PSYCHOSOCIAL SUPPORT;
CHILDHOOD-CANCER;
PEDIATRIC CANCER;
SYMPTOM CLUSTERS;
SELF-MANAGEMENT;
VIDEO GAME;
SURVIVORS;
CHILDREN;
FEASIBILITY;
D O I:
10.2196/12071
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background: The last decade has seen an increase in the number of digital health interventions designed to support adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. Objective: The objective of this review was to identify, characterize, and fully assess the quality, feasibility, and efficacy of existing digital health interventions developed specifically for AYAs, aged between 13 and 39 years, living with or beyond a cancer diagnosis. Methods: Searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify digital health interventions designed specifically for AYA living with or beyond a cancer diagnosis. Data on the characteristics and outcomes of each intervention were synthesized. Results: A total of 4731 intervention studies were identified through the searches; 38 interventions (43 research papers) met the inclusion criteria. Most (20/38, 53%) were website-based interventions. Most studies focused on symptom management and medication adherence (15, 39%), behavior change (15, 39%), self-care (8, 21%), and emotional health (7, 18%). Most digital health interventions included multiple automated and communicative functions such as enriched information environments, automated follow-up messages, and access to peer support. Where reported (20, 53% of studies), AYAs' subjective experience of using the digital platform was typically positive. The overall quality of the studies was found to be good (mean Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields scores >68%). Some studies reported feasibility outcomes (uptake, acceptability, and attrition) but were not sufficiently powered to comment on intervention effects. Conclusions: Numerous digital interventions have been developed and designed to support young people living with and beyond a diagnosis of cancer. However, many of these interventions have yet to be deployed, implemented, and evaluated at scale.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文