Standard non-target tests for risk assessment of plant protection products are unsuitable for entomopathogenic fungi-a proposal for a new protocol

被引:4
|
作者
Reinbacher, Lara [1 ,2 ]
Bacher, Sven [2 ]
Praprotnik, Eva [3 ]
Grabenweger, Giselher [1 ]
机构
[1] Agroscope, Res Div Plant Protect, Ecol Plant Protect Field Crops, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Fribourg, Unit Ecol & Evolut, Dept Biol, Fribourg, Switzerland
[3] Agr Inst Slovenia, Plant Protect Dept, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
Non-target effect; Biological control agent; Entomopathogenic fungus; Risk assessment; METARHIZIUM-ANISOPLIAE; BEAUVERIA-BASSIANA; SOIL; PATHOGENS; AGENTS; INFECTION; VIRULENCE; CONIDIA;
D O I
10.1007/s11368-021-02919-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose The successful implementation of a plant protection product depends on its effectiveness against a target species and its safety for the environment. Risk assessment schemes have therefore been devised to facilitate classification and regulation. These guidelines, however, are directed towards chemical substances and are in many cases less suitable for the assessment of products employing microorganisms. Methods In this study, we developed a protocol for non-target testing of soil-applied entomopathogenic fungi for the biocontrol of insect pests. Using the predatory mite Gaeolaelaps (Hypoaspis) aculeifer as a non-target model organism, our protocol evaluates the lethal and sublethal effects of the fungus in recommended and ten-fold field concentrations. Results The proposed protocol considers fungal biology when setting test duration, endpoints, and quality control measures. To assess its practicability, we performed a trial with Metarhizium brunneum ART2825 as a representative entomopathogenic fungus. The biocontrol agent was able to infect a susceptible host and reproduce, showing that potential hazards can be detected using our approach. No hazard was detected for the non-target species, with no statistically significant differences in 5-week survival and reproductive output between treated and untreated groups. Conclusion Based on our results, the protocol is deemed appropriate for the detection of non-target effects. Subject to further validation, our approach could thus provide the basis for standardized protocols for the evaluation of the environmental safety of biocontrol organisms.
引用
收藏
页码:2357 / 2368
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Standard non-target tests for risk assessment of plant protection products are unsuitable for entomopathogenic fungi—a proposal for a new protocol
    Lara Reinbacher
    Sven Bacher
    Eva Praprotnik
    Giselher Grabenweger
    [J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2021, 21 : 2357 - 2368
  • [2] Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for non-target arthropods
    Aagaard, Alf
    Brock, Theo
    Capri, Ettore
    Duquesne, Sabine
    Filipic, Metka
    Hernandez-Jerez, Antonio F.
    Hirsch-Ernst, Karen I.
    Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
    Klein, Michael
    Kuhl, Thomas
    Laskowski, Ryszard
    Liess, Matthias
    Mantovani, Alberto
    Ockleford, Colin
    Ossendorp, Bernadette
    Pickford, Daniel
    Smith, Robert
    Sousa, Paulo
    Sundh, Ingvar
    Tiktak, Aaldrik
    Van Der Linden, Ton
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (02)
  • [3] Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for non-target terrestrial plants
    Aagaard, Alf
    Brock, Theo
    Capri, Ettore
    Duquesne, Sabine
    Filipic, Metka
    Hernandez-Jerez, Antonio F.
    Hirsch-Ernst, Karen I.
    Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
    Klein, Michael
    Kuhl, Thomas
    Laskowski, Ryszard
    Liess, Matthias
    Mantovani, Alberto
    Ockleford, Colin
    Ossendorp, Bernadette
    Pickford, Daniel
    Smith, Robert
    Sousa, Paulo
    Sundh, Ingvar
    Tiktak, Aaldrik
    Van Der Linden, Ton
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2014, 12 (07)
  • [4] Calibration of laboratory derived indices for non-target arthropod risk assessment with field data for plant protection products
    Bakker, Frank
    Aldershof, Saskia
    Braaker, Sonja
    Dinter, Axel
    Elston, Charlotte
    Kroder, Stefan
    Mayer, Christoph-Julian
    Pilling, Ed
    Neumann, Paul
    [J]. ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2022, 235
  • [5] Assessing the comparative risk of plant protection products to honey bees, non-target arthropods and non-Apis bees
    Miles, Mark J.
    Alix, Anne
    [J]. HAZARDS OF PESTICIDES TO BEES: 11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE ICP-PR BEE PROTECTION GROUP, 2012, 437 : 30 - 38
  • [6] Recent developments in non-target terrestrial plant test protocols and risk assessment
    Ashby, P
    [J]. PESTICIDE BEHAVIOUR IN SOILS AND WATER, 2001, (78): : 437 - 444
  • [7] Application provisions of plant protection products protecting non-target terrestrial plants (NTTP) and non-target arthropods (NTA) in the treatment area (in-field)
    Alexander Koof
    [J]. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 2022, 129 : 1 - 14
  • [8] Application provisions of plant protection products protecting non-target terrestrial plants (NTTP) and non-target arthropods (NTA) in the treatment area (in-field)
    Koof, Alexander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2022, 129 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [9] A Hazard Quotient approach for assessing the risk to non-target arthropods from plant protection products under 91/414/EEC:: hazard quotient trigger value proposal and validation
    Campbell, PJ
    Brown, KC
    Harrison, EG
    Bakker, F
    Barrett, KL
    Candolfi, MP
    Cañez, V
    Dinter, A
    Lewis, G
    Mead-Briggs, M
    Miles, M
    Neumann, P
    Romijn, K
    Schmuck, R
    Shires, S
    Ufer, A
    Waltersdorfer, A
    [J]. ANZEIGER FUR SCHADLINGSKUNDE-JOURNAL OF PEST SCIENCE, 2000, 73 (05): : 117 - 124
  • [10] Recent developments in non-target terrestrial plant test protocols and risk assessment.
    Ashby, P
    [J]. BCPC CONFERENCE - WEEDS 2001, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, : 873 - 880