Comments on the article "Calculation of the electric potential and surface oxygen ion density for planar and spherical metal oxide grains by numerical solution of the Poisson equation coupled with Boltzmann and Fermi-Dirac statistics" (Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 293 (2019) 31-40)

被引:0
|
作者
Trakhtenberg, L. I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ilegbusi, O. J. [4 ]
Kozhushner, M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] RAS, Semenov Inst Chem Phys, 4 Kosygin St, Moscow 119991, Russia
[2] State Univ, Moscow Inst Phys & Technol, 9 Inst Skii Lane, Dolgoprudnyi 141700, Moscow Region, Russia
[3] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, 1-3 Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991, Russia
[4] Univ Cent Florida, 4000 Cent Florida Blvd, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
来源
关键词
Electric potential; Charge carrier density; Space charge density; Semiconductor nanoparticle; Free energy minimization; CHARGE-DISTRIBUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.snb.2019.126986
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The article by Barami, and Ghafarinia (Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 293 (2019) 31-40) considers the electric potential and surface oxygen ion density in metal oxide grains. However the problem was solved using the wrong assumptions. Specifically, the density of ionized (positively charged) donors along the nanoparticle radius was assumed to be constant, equal to the density in the massive semiconductor, and the concentration of negatively charged oxygen ions on the surface of the nanoparticle was chosen arbitrarily. The implication of the assumptions are discussed and suggestions are made for the correct approach.
引用
收藏
页数:2
相关论文
共 2 条