Analysis of Ergonomic Risk Factors in a Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Company

被引:0
|
作者
Jose, Jerrish A. [1 ]
Sharan, Deepak [2 ]
Rajkumar, Joshua Samuel [1 ]
机构
[1] RECOUP Neuromusculoskeletal Rehabil Ctr, Dept Physiotherapy, 312,10th Block, Bangalore 560108, KA, India
[2] RECOUP Neuromusculoskeletal Rehabil Ctr, Dept Orthoped & Rehabil, 312,10th Block, Bangalore 560108, KA, India
关键词
Ergonomic workplace analysis; Pharmaceutical company; Risk assessment;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-96068-5_39
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Ergonomic workplace analysis (EWA) in manufacturing industries have been carried out in various industrial sectors to evaluate the risk of Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WRMSD). A prospective EWA was conducted by a team of ergonomists in a pharmaceutical manufacturing company located in an Industrially Developing Country. Initially, an onsite inspection of workstation was done to identify ergonomic risk factors that might be considered to predispose the workers to WRMSD. Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (BRPE), Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and Rodgers Muscle Fatigue Analysis (RMFA) were used to identify risks in the respective tasks. All the 11 tasks involved high risk of WRMSD involving neck, back, knees, ankle, arm, elbow, hands and fingers and some task involving most body parts on RMFA. Scores of REBA also showed a very high postural risk. The top 3 tasks that had highest ergonomic risk scores evaluated were: 1. filling powder bottle (Task 4), 2. primary packing of tablets (Task 8) and 3. Loading (Task 11).
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 356
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The influence of ergonomic criteria and physical factors on the working system of manufacturing company
    Goerner, Tomas
    Simon, Michal
    [J]. CRAFTING GLOBAL COMPETITIVE ECONOMIES: 2020 VISION STRATEGIC PLANNING & SMART IMPLEMENTATION, VOLS I-IV, 2014, : 878 - 894
  • [2] ERGONOMIC PROBLEMS AND STRESS AMONG WORKERS IN A MANUFACTURING COMPANY
    Hassan, Zuraida
    Sarif, Nurul Hayati Hanisah Mohd
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2015, 22 (02): : 17 - 31
  • [3] Ergonomic risk factors analysis in remote workplace
    Wodajeneh, Shemelis Nesibu
    Azene, Daniel Kitawu
    Abebe, Birhanu Beshah
    Sileyew, Kassu Jilcha
    Dadi, Gezahegn Tesfaye
    [J]. THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2023, 24 (06) : 681 - 697
  • [4] Analysis of ergonomic risk factors in construction industry
    Ishwarya, G. K. Abinaya
    Rajkumar, D.
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 37 : 2415 - 2418
  • [5] Analysis and Recommendations for an Automotive Manufacturing Assembly Station Ergonomic Risk
    Backstrom, Jessica
    Duffy, Vincent G.
    [J]. HCI INTERNATIONAL 2022 - LATE BREAKING PAPERS: ERGONOMICS AND PRODUCT DESIGN, HCII 2022, 2022, 13522 : 59 - 79
  • [6] Analysis of Company Development Factors in Manufacturing and Service Company: a Strategic Approach
    Borocki, Jelena
    Cosic, Ilija
    Lalic, Bojan
    Maksimovic, Rado
    [J]. STROJNISKI VESTNIK-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 57 (01): : 55 - 68
  • [7] Risk Analysis for Performance Improvement in a Romanian Pharmaceutical Company
    Deselnicu, Dana Corina
    Negoita, Olivia Doina
    Purcarea, Anca Alexandra
    [J]. TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS, 2018, 7 (02): : 319 - 323
  • [8] Usability of an open ERP System in a manufacturing company: An ergonomic perspective
    Hankiewicz, Krzysztof
    Jayathilaka, K. R. Kumara
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HYGIENE VI, 2018, : 471 - 476
  • [9] Risks assessment at automotive manufacturing company and ergonomic working condition
    Fazi, Hamizatun Binti Mohd
    Mohamed, Nik Mohd Zuki B. Nik
    Bin Basri, Azizul Qayyum
    [J]. 1ST INTERNATIONAL POSTGRADUATE CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (IPCME2018), 2019, 469
  • [10] Improvement of manufacturing operations at a pharmaceutical company A lean manufacturing approach
    Chowdary, Boppana V.
    George, Damian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2011, 23 (01) : 56 - 75