Capacity Investment Under Postponement Strategies, Market Competition, and Demand Uncertainty

被引:87
|
作者
Anupindi, Ravi [1 ]
Jiang, Li [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Stephen M Ross Sch Business, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Logist, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
postponement; flexibility; duopoly; Cournot competition; Bertrand competition;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1080.0940
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We consider duopoly models where firms make decisions on capacity, production, and price under demand uncertainty. Capacity and price decisions are made, respectively, ex ante and ex post demand realizations. The interplay between the timings of demand realization and production decision endows firms with different capabilities. Flexible firms can postpone production decisions until the actual demand curve is observed, but inflexible firms cannot. Under general demand structures and cost functions, we characterize the equilibrium for a symmetric duopoly and establish the strategic equivalence of price and quantity competitions when firms are flexible. We investigate the stochastic order properties of capacity and profit and show that they both increase for a flexible firm when the market is more volatile. We find that flexibility allows a firm to increase investment in capacity and earn a higher profit while benefiting customers by keeping the price in a narrower range; strategic equivalence implies that these properties are robust to market conjectures. We also show that flexibility plays an important role in mitigating the destructive effect of competition when the demand shock is additive; the destructive effect is nonexistent for firms facing multiplicative demand shock. When flexibility decision is endogenous, a firm's strategic flexibility choice depends on the cost of technology as well as the nature of demand shock. In particular, faced with a multiplicative demand shock,firms always choose to be inflexible, whereas all the possible equilibria are observed under additive demand shocks.
引用
收藏
页码:1876 / 1890
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investment Strategies in Supplier Development under Capacity and Demand Uncertainty
    Golmohammadi, Amirmohsen
    Hassini, Elkafi
    [J]. DECISION SCIENCES, 2021, 52 (01) : 109 - 141
  • [2] Product Market Competition and Corporate Real Estate Investment under Demand Uncertainty
    Ambrose, Brent W.
    Diop, Moussa
    Yoshida, Jiro
    [J]. REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS, 2017, 45 (03) : 521 - 590
  • [3] Flexible capacity strategy with multiple market periods under demand uncertainty and investment constraint
    Yang, Liu
    Ng, C. T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 236 (02) : 511 - 521
  • [4] Volume flexibility and capacity investment under demand uncertainty
    Hagspiel, Verena
    Huisman, Kuno J. M.
    Kort, Peter M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2016, 178 : 95 - 108
  • [5] Network Game and Capacity Investment Under Market Uncertainty
    Hu, Qiaohai
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 19 (01) : 98 - 110
  • [6] Capacity investment in electricity markets under supply and demand uncertainty
    Pinho, Joana
    Resende, Joana
    Soares, Isabel
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 150 : 1006 - 1017
  • [7] Strategic technology choice and capacity investment under demand uncertainty
    Goyal, Manu
    Netessine, Serguei
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (02) : 192 - 207
  • [8] Capacity investment model for airport facilities under demand uncertainty
    Sun, Yanshuo
    Schonfeld, Paul M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2016, 50 (08) : 1896 - 1911
  • [9] Technology investment under flexible capacity strategy with demand uncertainty
    Yang, Liu
    Wang, Yonggui
    Ma, Jun
    Ng, Chi To
    Cheng, T. C. E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2014, 154 : 190 - 197
  • [10] Flexible Capacity Strategy in an Asymmetric Oligopoly Market with Competition and Demand Uncertainty
    Yang, Liu
    Ng, Chi To
    Ni, Yaodong
    [J]. NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS, 2017, 64 (02) : 117 - 138