punitiveness;
group threat;
ethnic intolerance;
comparative criminology;
LAW-ENFORCEMENT STRENGTH;
DEATH-PENALTY;
REGIONAL DIFFERENCES;
ANTI-IMMIGRANT;
PUBLIC VIEWS;
CAPITAL-PUNISHMENT;
PUNITIVE ATTITUDES;
EUROPEAN SOCIETIES;
GROUP COMPETITION;
SOCIAL DIVISIONS;
D O I:
10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00275.x
中图分类号:
DF [法律];
D9 [法律];
学科分类号:
0301 ;
摘要:
Scholars often have used the group threat thesis to explain why punitiveness varies across places. This research regularly has found that punitiveness is harsher in places with a larger minority population. Yet researchers only have had a rudimentary grasp of why this is the case. Moreover, most prior research has focused only on the United States, giving us little knowledge of whether the group threat thesis is a viable explanation of cross-national differences in punitiveness. In the current study, we postulate that the relative size of the out-group population affects punitiveness indirectly, via its impact on individual intolerance toward ethnic out-groups. We test this thesis cross-nationally with data from individuals residing in 27 European countries. Our findings are consistent with the argument that greater racial/ethnic diversity at the country level affects individuals attitudes toward minority out-groups, which in turn increases their support for severely punishing criminal offenders.