Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect

被引:6
|
作者
Meeks, J. Thadeus [1 ]
Knight, Justin B. [2 ,3 ]
Brewer, Gene A. [4 ]
Cook, Gabriel I. [5 ]
Marsh, Richard L. [6 ]
机构
[1] Southern Illinois Univ Edwardsville, Dept Psychol, Edwardsville, IL 62025 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, BioImaging Res Ctr, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Psychol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[5] Claremont Mckenna Coll, Dept Psychol, Claremont, CA USA
[6] Univ Georgia, Dept Psychol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Recognition memory; Word frequency; Rejection processes; Remember-Know; REMEMBER-KNOW JUDGMENTS; RECALL-TO-REJECT; RECOGNITION MEMORY; ASSOCIATIVE RECOGNITION; FALSE RECOGNITION; RECOLLECTION; FAMILIARITY; DECISION; NONOCCURRENCES; MEMORABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We sought to systematically investigate how participants subjectively classify the basis of their recognition memory judgments for low and high word frequency items. We found that participants more often reported rejection processes related to the increased perceived memorability for unstudied low word frequency items (relative to high word frequency items), rather than classifying their decision on a lack of familiarity. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern and demonstrated context variability and word frequency independently influenced the subjective classifications for correct rejections. Results of Experiment 3 revealed that these differences are dependent upon having experience with both low and high frequency items. Overall, these data suggest participants' rejection of low frequency items is more strongly related to judgments of perceived memorability, but only when they are presented in the context of high frequency items. The results are discussed in relation to distinctiveness and expected memorability. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 69
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Context modulates discrepancy attribution processes: Evidence from the word frequency mirror effect
    Festag, Lisa
    Tarantini, Luca
    Mecklinger, Axel
    Bader, Regine
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2023, 170
  • [2] SUBJECTIVE SCALING OF WORD FREQUENCY
    TRYK, HE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 81 (02): : 170 - &
  • [3] Reflections on the mirror effect: Comparisons of word frequency and nonword pronounceability
    Bohlscheid, E.
    Chalmers, KA.
    Heathcote, A.
    Hockley, WE.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 58 : 64 - 64
  • [4] ON PERCEPTUAL AND MEMORY PROCESSES IN WORD-FREQUENCY EFFECT
    RICHARDS, LG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 86 (04): : 717 - 728
  • [5] SUBJECTIVE ESTIMATION OF RELATIVE WORD FREQUENCY
    SHAPIRO, BJ
    JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1969, 8 (02): : 248 - &
  • [7] The subjective frequency of word n-grams
    Shaoul, Cyrus
    Westbury, Chris F.
    Baayen, R. Harald
    PSIHOLOGIJA, 2013, 46 (04) : 497 - 537
  • [8] Word frequency and word likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory
    Heathcote, Andrew
    Ditton, Elizabeth
    Mitchell, Kristie
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2006, 34 (04) : 826 - 838
  • [9] Word frequency and word likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory
    Andrew Heathcote
    Elizabeth Ditton
    Kristie Mitchell
    Memory & Cognition, 2006, 34 : 826 - 838
  • [10] Midazolam amnesia and dual-process models of the word-frequency mirror effect
    Hirshman, E
    Fisher, J
    Henthorn, T
    Arndt, J
    Passannante, A
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2002, 47 (04) : 499 - 516