Assessing the impact of migraine

被引:41
|
作者
Dowson, AJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, Kings Headache Serv, London SE5 9RS, England
关键词
migraine; impact; disability; impact tools; headache guidelines;
D O I
10.1185/030079901753403207
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Migraine is a remarkably disabling condition, although unpredictable and heterogeneous in frequency, duration and severity. It can be difficult to manage in primary care, where it is under-recognised, under-diagnosed and under-treated. Proposals have been made that migraine care could be improved by incorporating assessments of migraine impact into management strategies. Research has shown that measuring headache-related disability, together with assessments of pain intensity, headache frequency, tiredness, mood alterations and cognition can be used to assess the impact of migraine on sufferers' lives and society, From this research, two simple and brief impact tools were developed: the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire and the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Both tools are scientifically valid measures of migraine severity and have the potential to improve communication between patients and their physicians, assess migraine severity and act as outcome measures to monitor treatment efficacy. Each of these tools offers its own advantages. For example, HIT was designed for greater accessibility (on the Internet at www.headachetest.com and www.amlhealthy.com, and as a paper-based form known as HIT-6) and has a wider coverage of the spectrum of headache than MIDAS. Impact tools are also being increasingly recommended as part of generalised headache management guidelines to produce an individualised treatment plan for each patient in concert with other clinical assessments. It is not possible as yet to recommend unequivocally the optimal impact tool for use in primary care, but it should be usable by GPs, pharmacists, nurses and patients, and for research purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 309
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the Impact of Migraine Onset on Work Productivity
    Landy, Stephen H.
    Runken, M. Chris
    Bell, Christopher F.
    Higbie, Rachel L.
    Haskins, Lisa S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2011, 53 (01) : 74 - 81
  • [2] Psychometric Evaluation of a Novel Instrument Assessing the Impact of Migraine on Physical Functioning: The Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary
    Kawata, Ariane K.
    Hsieh, Ray
    Bender, Randall
    Shaffer, Shannon
    Revicki, Dennis A.
    Bayliss, Martha
    Buse, Dawn C.
    Desai, Pooja
    Sapra, Sandhya
    Ortmeier, Brian
    Hareendran, Asha
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2017, 57 (09): : 1385 - 1398
  • [3] Assessing Anxiety and Its Impact on Adolescent and Young Adults with Migraine
    O'Brien, H. L.
    Green, A.
    Hershey, A. D.
    Kabbouche, M. A.
    Kacperski, J.
    Horn, P.
    Slater, S. K.
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2015, 55 : 164 - 165
  • [4] Assessing the impact of migraine on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo symptoms and recovery
    Cakir, Seda
    Sahin, Aysenur
    Gedik-Soyuyuce, Ozlem
    Gumus, Zeynep Gence
    Sertdemir, Ibrahim
    Korkut, Nazim
    Dikmen, Pinar Yalinay
    [J]. BMC NEUROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [5] Assessing the burden of migraine
    Dodick, D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2004, 11 : 363 - 363
  • [6] Assessing migraine disability
    Andrasik, F
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 1999, 19 (02) : 74 - 74
  • [7] Assessing migraine therapeutics
    Xu, Cen
    Bussiere, Jeanine
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2021, 41 (13) : 1402 - 1403
  • [8] A multicenter, open label study assessing the efficacy of erenumab on functional impact of migraine
    Diamond, M. L.
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2022, 62 (07): : 921 - 922
  • [9] Perception de l’impact de la migraine par le patient: les outils de mesureTools for assessing patient perception of the impact of migraine
    Abdelkader El Hasnaoui
    Adam Doble
    Anne-Françoise Gaudin
    [J]. CNS Drugs, 2006, 20 (Suppl 1) : 24 - 36
  • [10] THE IMPACT OF MIGRAINE
    STEWART, WF
    LIPTON, RB
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1994, 44 (06) : 5 - 5