Identification of Pathologically Favorable Disease in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Implications for Active Surveillance Candidates Selection

被引:16
|
作者
Gandaglia, Giorgio [1 ]
Schiffmann, Jonas [2 ]
Schlomm, Thorsten [2 ,3 ]
Fossati, Nicola [1 ]
Moschini, Marco [1 ]
Suardi, Nazareno [1 ]
Chun, Felix K. H. [3 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [1 ]
Graefen, Markus [2 ]
Briganti, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Osped San Raffaele, IRCCS, Urol Res Inst, Div Oncol,Unit Urol, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Clin Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
来源
PROSTATE | 2015年 / 75卷 / 13期
关键词
prostate cancer; active surveillance; radical prostatectomy; favorable disease; final pathology; biochemical recurrence; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TUMOR VOLUME; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; INSIGNIFICANT DISEASE; MEN; OUTCOMES; GLEASON-SCORE-6; CLASSIFICATION; PREDICTION; THRESHOLD;
D O I
10.1002/pros.23040
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) represents a heterogeneous disease, where a non-negligible proportion of patients harbor favorable pathologic characteristics and are potentially eligible for active surveillance (AS). We aimed at developing a model for the identification of pathologically favorable PCa at radical prostatectomy (RP) among intermediate-risk patients. METHODS. Overall, 3,821 intermediate-risk patients treated with RP at two centers between 2005 and 2013 were identified. Pathologically favorable PCa was defined as low-grade organ-confined disease. Age, biopsy Gleason, PSA density (PSAD), and the percentage of positive cores were included in multivariable logistic regression analyses predicting favorable PCa and formed the basis for a logistic regression-based risk calculator. The internally validated discrimination and calibration of the risk calculator were quantified using 200 bootstrap resamples. Decision curve analysis (DCA) provided an estimate of the net benefit obtained using this model versus treating no one and treating everyone. RESULTS. Overall, 10.0% of all intermediate risk patients had favorable disease. In multivariable analyses, patients with biopsy Gleason score <= 6 had higher probability of favorable disease compared to those with higher-grade disease (P <= 0.001). Similarly, age, PSAD, and percentage of positive cores were associated with the probability of favorable disease (all P <= 0.01). The risk calculator achieved a validated accuracy of 82.5%. The DCA showed that our prediction model is better than both treating no one and treating everyone. CONCLUSIONS. One out of ten intermediate-risk patients harbors favorable disease at RP. Our novel, pre-operative, validated risk calculator may help clinicians identifying patients who could be considered for conservative therapy approaches such as AS. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1484 / 1491
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IDENTIFICATION OF PATHOLOGICALLY FAVORABLE DISEASE IN INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SELECTION OF ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE CANDIDATES
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Bianchi, Marco
    Fossati, Nicola
    Deho, Federico
    Zanni, Giuseppe
    Abdollah, Firas
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Zaffuto, Emanuele
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Karakiewicz, Pierre
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E599 - E599
  • [2] Are men with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer candidates for active surveillance?
    Raldow, Ann Caroline
    Zhang, Danjie
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Braccioforte, Michelle H.
    Moran, Brian Joseph
    D'Amico, Anthony Victor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (07)
  • [3] Prognostic Value of the Intermediate-risk Feature in Men with Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance
    Sherer, Michael, V
    Leonard, Austin J.
    Nelson, Tyler J.
    Guram, Kripa
    De Moraes, Gustavo Rodrigues
    Javier-Desloges, Juan
    Kane, Christopher
    McKay, Rana R.
    Rose, Brent S.
    Bagrodia, Aditya
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 50 : 61 - 67
  • [4] Identifying intermediate-risk candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer
    Savdie, Richard
    Aning, Jonathan
    So, Alan I.
    Black, Peter C.
    Gleave, Martin E.
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 35 (10) : 605.e1 - 605.e8
  • [5] Risk Group and Death From Prostate Cancer Implications for Active Surveillance in Men With Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Raldow, Ann C.
    Zhang, Danjie
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Braccioforte, Michelle H.
    Moran, Brian J.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2015, 1 (03) : 334 - 340
  • [6] Re: Risk Group and Death From Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance in Men with Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (02) : 370 - 370
  • [7] Re: Risk Group and Death from Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance in Men with Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Taneja, Samir S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (02): : 412 - 413
  • [8] PROSTATE CANCER Time for active surveillance of intermediate-risk disease?
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2013, 10 (01) : 6 - 8
  • [9] Active surveillance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 (03) : 346 - 354
  • [10] Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    M A Dall'Era
    L Klotz
    [J]. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2017, 20 : 1 - 6