Influence of plaque calcium on neointimal hyperplasia following bare metal and drug-eluting stent implantation

被引:23
|
作者
Shimada, Yoshihisa
Kataoka, Toru
Courtney, Brian K.
Morino, Yoshihiro
Bonneau, Heidi N.
Yock, Paul G.
Grube, Eberhard
Honda, Yasuhiro
Fitzgerald, Peter J.
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Res Cardiovasc Intervent, Div Cardiovasc Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Highlands Consulting Inc, San Jose, CA USA
[3] Heart Ctr Siegburg, Dept Cardiol Angiol, Siegburg, Germany
关键词
coronary diseases; stents; ultrasonics; calcium;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.20708
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine the influence of vessel wall calcium on neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) following bare metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Background: While procedural complications with coronary stenting in calcified lesions are well reported, little is known about subsequent NIH on plaque calcium following either BMS or DES implantation. Methods: In the Study to Compare REstenosis Rate between QueST and QuaDDS-QP2 (SCORE) trial, 6 months follow-up volumetric intravascular ultrasound data were available for 41 lesions (BMS, 19; DES, 22). NIH thicknesses on superficial, deep, and noncalcified plaque were calculated at every 0.5 mm intervals over the stented segment. Calcified and less-calcified cross-sections were defined as those containing arcs of plaque calcium >= 90 degrees and <90 degrees, respectively. Results: In BMS, mean NIH thickness on both superficial (0.24 +/- 0.23 mm) and deep calcium (0.25 +/- 0.21 mm) was significantly smaller than that of noncalcified plaque (0.31 +/- 0.22 mm) (P < 0.0005). NIH area was significantly smaller in calcified cross-sections compared to less-calcified cross-sections (2.1 +/- 1.2 mm(2) vs. 3.1 +/- 1.9 mm(2), p < 0.0001). While in contrast, in DES, mean NIH thickness was similar, irrespective of the presence or location of calcium (0.03 +/- 0.05 mm vs. 0.03 +/- 0.06 mm vs. 0.03 +/- 0.05 mm, superficial vs. deep vs. noncalcified plaque, P = NS). NIH area was also similar between calcified and less-calcified cross-sections (0.3 +/- 0.6 mm(2) VS. 0.3 +/- 0.6 mm(2), P = NS). Conclusions: These results suggest that while plaque calcium may influence NIH following BMS implantation, NIH suppression using DES does not appear to be affected by the presence or location of calcium. (C) 2006 Wiley-Liss., Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:866 / 869
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Drug-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of bare-metal or drug-eluting stent restenosis
    Nezuo, Shintaro
    Okura, Hiroyuki
    Fukuhara, Kenzo
    Kume, Teruyoshi
    Hayashida, Akihiro
    Neishi, Yoji
    Kawamoto, Takahiro
    Yoshida, Kiyoshi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (17) : B183 - B183
  • [2] Bare metal stent implantation for in-stent restenosis with a drug-eluting stent
    Matsuoka, Hiroshi
    Kawakami, Hideo
    Ohshita, Akira
    Kohno, Tamami
    Shigemi, Susumu
    Okayama, Hideki
    Higaki, Jitsuo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (01) : 135 - 138
  • [3] Comparison of inflammatory markers for the prediction of neointimal hyperplasia after drug-eluting stent implantation
    Kang, Woong Chol
    Moon, Chan Il
    Lee, Kyounghoon
    Han, Seung Hwan
    Suh, Soon Yong
    Moon, Jeonggeun
    Shin, Mi Seung
    Ahn, Taehoon
    Shin, Eak Kyun
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2011, 22 (08) : 526 - 532
  • [4] Restenosis in a Bare-Metal Stent: Drug-Eluting Balloon or Drug-Eluting Stent?
    Colombo, Antonio
    Jabbour, Richard J.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (04)
  • [5] Influence of calcium on neointimal growth following drug-eluting and bare metal stents implantation: A 3-D intravascular ultrasound substudy of the SCORE trial
    Kataoka, T
    Morino, Y
    Courtney, BK
    Basisht, R
    Hur, SH
    Yock, PG
    Grube, E
    Fitzgerald, PJ
    Honda, Y
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) : 80A - 81A
  • [6] Plaque progression in neighboring segment of stent: Comparison between drug-eluting Stent and bare metal stent
    Park, Yong Hwan
    Lee, Sang Yeub
    Song, Bong Gun
    Cho, Soo Jin
    Hahn, Joo-Yong
    Choi, Jin Ho
    Choi, Seung-Hyuk
    Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
    Lee, Sang Hoon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 51 (10) : B88 - B89
  • [8] Hybrid Strategy of Bare Metal Stent With Drug-eluting Stent Implantation versus an Exclusive Drug-eluting Stent for Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Syed, Asmir I.
    Collins, Sara D.
    Ben-Dor, Itsik
    Li, Yanlin
    Maluenda, Gabriel
    Delhaye, Cedric
    Wakabayashi, Kohei
    Scheinowitz, Mickey
    Torguson, Rebecca
    Kaneshige, Kimberly
    Xue, Zhenyi
    Satler, Lowell F.
    Kent, Kenneth M.
    Suddath, William O.
    Pichard, Augusto D.
    Lindsay, Joseph
    Waksman, Ron
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (18) : S972 - S973
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of in-stent restenosis occurring within bare-metal stent and drug-eluting stent
    Heng Ge
    Qing Zhang
    Wei Zhou
    Qing He
    Zhi-hua Han
    Ben He
    Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B, 2010, 11 : 553 - 560
  • [10] COMPARISON OF INFLAMMATORY MARKERS FOR PREDICTION OF NEOINTIMAL HYPERPLASIA PROLIFERATION AFTER DRUG-ELUTING STENT IMPLANTATION
    Kang, Woong Chol
    Park, Yae Min
    Il Moon, Chan
    Lee, Kyounghoon
    Shin, Kwen-Chul
    Kim, Myeong Gun
    Oh, Kyong Yong
    Kim, Eui Joo
    Han, Seung Hwan
    Ahn, Taehoon
    Shin, Eak Kyun
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (14) : E1974 - E1974