Quality in education discourse:"economy of scope" vs. "ecology of practice"

被引:0
|
作者
Djermanov, Jelena [1 ]
Kosanovic, Marijana [1 ]
Kostovic, Svetlana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Philosophy, Dept Pedag, Novi Sad, Serbia
来源
关键词
quality as phenomenon; quality in education; managerial and environmental approach to education quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The thesis on quality as a universal phenomenon which becomes imperative of the time in the 21 century is being elaborated and the thesis "that the quality starts and ends with education" is being strongly promoted. This paper points out the persistence of the idea of quality in the historical perspective, quality as a general concept is being considered, evolution and relativity of meaning. Attention is focused on the theoretical, conceptual and practical problems of quality in education. Competing methodological and epistemological approaches were analyzed in particular because of their implications for theory and practice of education. Potential of constructive overcoming the false dilemma "economy vs. ecology" lays in the critical insight of dysfunctional polarized points of view: structural-managemental (focused on the standardization of education and organizational effectiveness) versus socio-ecological (which emphasizes ethics and human values of education). Which would allow consideration of global demands for comparability of educational outcomes in the context of local needs and specific characteristics of different educational systems when building of an authentic pedagogical approach to quality in education. Corroboration of this view is provided by a new generation of educational effectiveness research, which affirm exactly that direction.
引用
收藏
页码:1260 / 1266
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Argumentation Quality Assessment: Theory vs. Practice
    Wachsmuth, Henning
    Naderi, Nona
    Habernal, Ivan
    Hou, Yufang
    Hirst, Graeme
    Gurevych, Iryna
    Stein, Benno
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 55TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (ACL 2017), VOL 2, 2017, : 250 - 255
  • [2] Economy vs. history
    Sanner, Helge
    [J]. ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2009, 43 (02): : 283 - 306
  • [3] METADISCOURSE VS. DISCOURSE MARKERS
    Lelicanin, Marija S. Koprivic
    [J]. NASLEDE, 2014, 11 (27): : 155 - 168
  • [4] LEVELS OF ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING OF THE EDUCATION: QUALITY VS. POLICY
    Osuna Llaneza, Jose Luis
    Bueno Suarez, Carlos
    Murciano Rosado, Juan
    Porrini Marrau, Laura
    [J]. REVISTA FUENTES, 2010, (10): : 101 - 122
  • [5] EDUCATION SERVICE QUALITY - PRIVATE VS. PUBLIC BUSINESS EDUCATION IN CROATIA
    Simic, Mirna Leko
    Stimac, Helena
    Barilovic, Zlatko
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ESD 2019), 2019, : 75 - 84
  • [6] GRAY VS. POWELL AND THE SCOPE OF REVIEW
    Schwartz, Bernard
    [J]. MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, 1955, 54 (01) : 1 - 70
  • [7] DISCOURSE OF SCIENCE VS. TECHNICAL DISCOURSE: IMPLICATIONS FOR TERMINOLOGY
    Mantovani Dal Corno, Giselle Olvia
    [J]. DEBATE TERMINOLOGICO, 2008, (04):
  • [8] Railway ecology vs. road ecology: similarities and differences
    Barrientos, Rafael
    Ascensao, Fernando
    Beja, Pedro
    Pereira, Henrique M.
    Borda-de-Agua, Luis
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 65 (01)
  • [9] Railway ecology vs. road ecology: similarities and differences
    Rafael Barrientos
    Fernando Ascensão
    Pedro Beja
    Henrique M. Pereira
    Luís Borda-de-Água
    [J]. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2019, 65
  • [10] Intended vs Reported Scope of Practice
    Sugihara, Masako
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (20): : 2233 - 2234