Should mycophenolate mofetil replace cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for severe lupus nephritis?

被引:12
|
作者
Hogan, Jonathan [1 ]
Schwenk, Michael H.
Radhakrishnan, Jai [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Columbia Univ Med Ctr, Div Nephrol, Dept Med, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
glomerular disease; glomerulonephritis; lupus nephritis; LONG-TERM; INTRAVENOUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; INDUCTION TREATMENT; AZATHIOPRINE; METAANALYSIS; DISEASE; TRIAL; RACE/ETHNICITY; ERYTHEMATOSUS; NEPHROPATHY;
D O I
10.1038/ki.2012.203
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Available treatments for severe (class III, IV, and V) lupus nephritis (LN) have expanded greatly over the last 40 years. In the 1970s and 1980s, cyclphosphamide (CYC), in combination with glucocorticoids, gained favor as induction and maintenance therapy for severe LN. However, the adverse event profile of CYC led to the search for other medications for severe LN. Beginning in the late 1990s, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was introduced as induction and maintenance therapy for severe LN. This review discusses the clinical trial results, pharmacology, cost-effectiveness, and adverse effect profiles of CYC compared to MMF for induction and maintenance therapy for severe LN. The authors conclude that MMF should be considered first-line induction and maintenance treatment therapy for severe LN, although CYC may have a place under specific clinical and economic circumstances. Kidney International (2012) 82, 1256-1260; doi:10.1038/ki.2012.203; published online 30 May 2012
引用
收藏
页码:1256 / 1260
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The cost-effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as first-line therapy in active lupus nephritis
    Wilson, E. C.
    Jayne, D. R.
    Dellow, E.
    Fordham, R. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (03) : A105 - A106
  • [2] Mycophenolate mofetil therapy for lupus nephritis refractory to intravenous cyclophosphamide
    Glicklich, D
    Acharya, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1998, 32 (02) : 318 - 322
  • [3] Mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis
    Ginzler, EM
    Dooley, MA
    Aranow, C
    Kim, MY
    Buyon, J
    Merrill, JT
    Petri, M
    Gilkeson, GS
    Wallace, DJ
    Weisman, MH
    Appel, GB
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (21): : 2219 - 2228
  • [4] Mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide in lupus nephritis
    Killen, JP
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (07): : 764 - 765
  • [5] Mycophenolate mofetil for lupus nephritis refractory to cyclophosphamide
    Baños, I
    Yebra, M
    Fernández, J
    Cajal, YSR
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2003, 121 (04): : 158 - 158
  • [6] Induction therapy for active lupus nephritis: mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide
    Christian Burchardi
    Detlef Schlöndorff
    Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology, 2006, 2 : 314 - 315
  • [7] Induction therapy for active lupus nephritis: mycophenolate mofetil is superior to cyclophosphamide
    Jennifer R Elliott
    Susan Manzi
    Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology, 2006, 2 : 354 - 355
  • [8] Induction therapy for active lupus nephritis: mycophenolate mofetil is superior to cyclophosphamide
    Elliott, Jennifer R.
    Manzi, Susan
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE RHEUMATOLOGY, 2006, 2 (07): : 354 - 355
  • [9] Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis refractary to intravenous cyclophosphamide
    Daza, Leonel
    Perez, Salvador
    Velasco, Ulises
    Hernandez, Martha
    REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA, 2006, 2 (05): : 247 - 250
  • [10] Mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide in lupus nephritis - Reply
    Ginzler, EM
    Dooley, MA
    Kim, MY
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (07): : 765 - 765