Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage

被引:122
|
作者
Pawar, Rajesh J. [1 ]
Bromhal, Grant S. [2 ]
Carey, J. William [3 ]
Foxall, William [4 ]
Korre, Anna [5 ]
Ringrose, Philip S. [6 ]
Tucker, Owain [7 ]
Watson, Maxwell N. [8 ]
White, Joshua A. [9 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Computat Earth Sci EES 16, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[2] Natl Energy Technol Lab, Morgantown, WV 26507 USA
[3] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Earth & Environm Sci Div, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Div Earth Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[5] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Earth Sci & Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
[6] Statoil ASA NTNU, N-7005 Trondheim, Norway
[7] Shell Projects & Technol Upstream Dev, Aberdeen AB123FY, Scotland
[8] CO2CRC Ltd, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[9] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Atmospher Earth & Energy Div, Livermore, CA 94551 USA
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
CCS; Risk assessment; Risk management; Geologic CO2 storage; Risk communication; Quantitative risk assessment; INJECTION-INDUCED SEISMICITY; WELLBORE INTEGRITY; GROUND-MOTION; CARBON CAPTURE; SYSTEM MODEL; LEAKAGE RISK; OIL-FIELD; SEQUESTRATION; PERFORMANCE; PROJECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper gives an overview of the advances made in the field of risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage (GCS), since the publication of the IPCC Special Report on Carbon Capture and Storage in 2005. Development and operation of a wide range of demonstration projects coupled with development of new regulations for safe injection and storage of CO2 have led to development and deployment of a range of risk assessment approaches. New methods and tools have been developed for quantitative and qualitative risk assessment. These methods have been integrated effectively with monitoring and mitigation techniques and deployed in the field for small-scale field tests as well as large-scale commercial projects. An important development has been improved definition of risks, which can be broadly classed as site performance risks, long-term containment risks, public perception risks and market risks. Considerable experience has now been gained on understanding and managing site performance risks. Targeted research on containment risks and induced seismicity risks has led to improved understanding of parameters and processes influencing these risks as well as identifying key uncertainties that need to be targeted. Finally, significant progress has been made to effectively integrate communication strategies with risk management approaches to increase stakeholder confidence in effectiveness of deployed risk management approaches to manage risks. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 311
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantitative assessment of CO2 leakage risk in geologic carbon storage management
    Jing, Meng
    Li, Qi
    Liu, Guizhen
    Xue, Quan
    [J]. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2024, 14 (06) : 1068 - 1091
  • [2] Recent research advances in enhanced CO2 mineralization and geologic CO2 storage
    Zhang, Chi
    Wang, Yuhang
    Kou, Zuhao
    Zhang, Liwei
    [J]. ADVANCES IN GEO-ENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 10 (03): : 141 - 145
  • [3] Dynamic risk assessment for geologic CO2 sequestration
    Chen, Bailian
    Harp, Dylan R.
    Zhang, Yingqi
    Oldenburg, Curtis M.
    Pawar, Rajesh J.
    [J]. GONDWANA RESEARCH, 2023, 122 : 232 - 242
  • [4] Translating risk assessment to contingency planning for CO2 geologic storage: A methodological framework
    Farhat, Karim
    Benson, Sally M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 52 : 410 - 431
  • [5] The Leakage Risk Monetization Model for Geologic CO2 Storage
    Bielicki, Jeffrey M.
    Pollak, Melisa F.
    Deng, Hang
    Wilson, Elizabeth J.
    Fitts, Jeffrey P.
    Peters, Catherine A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (10) : 4923 - 4931
  • [6] GPU simulations for risk assessment in CO2 geologic sequestration
    Zhang, Yan
    Vouzis, Panagiotis
    Sahinidis, Nikolaos V.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 35 (08) : 1631 - 1644
  • [7] Dissolved CO2 Injection to Eliminate the Risk of CO2 Leakage in Geologic Carbon Storage
    Vilarrasa, Victor
    Poo, Maria
    De Simone, Silvia
    Carrera, Jesus
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICS, VOL 3: TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE GEOENVIRONMENT, 2019, : 89 - 96
  • [8] Progress in monitoring strategies for risk reduction in geologic CO2 storage
    Harbert, William
    Daley, Thomas M.
    Bromhal, Grant
    Sullivan, Charlotte
    Huang, Lianjie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 51 : 260 - 275
  • [9] Introduction to special section: CO2 geologic storage and utilization: Recent advances and future perspectives
    Dunlap, Dallas B.
    Bakhshian, Sahar
    Pawar, Rajesh J.
    White, Joshua A.
    Soltanian, Reza
    Dashtian, Hassan
    [J]. INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2022, 10 (03): : SGI - SGI
  • [10] Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation
    Aven, Terje
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 253 (01) : 1 - 13