Model-based estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full-field digital mammography images from image-acquisition physics and patient-image characteristics

被引:0
|
作者
Keller, Brad M. [1 ]
Nathan, Diane L. [1 ]
Conant, Emily F. [1 ]
Kontos, Despina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Digital Mammography; Breast Percent Density; PD%; Model-based Assessment; Breast Cancer Risk; CLASSIFICATION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1117/12.912368
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Breast percent density (PD%), as measured mammographically, is one of the strongest known risk factors for breast cancer. While the majority of studies to date have focused on PD% assessment from digitized film mammograms, digital mammography (DM) is becoming increasingly common, and allows for direct PD% assessment at the time of imaging. This work investigates the accuracy of a generalized linear model-based (GLM) estimation of PD% from raw and post-processed digital mammograms, utilizing image acquisition physics, patient characteristics and gray-level intensity features of the specific image. The model is trained in a leave-one-woman-out fashion on a series of 81 cases for which bilateral, mediolateral-oblique DM images were available in both raw and post-processed format. Baseline continuous and categorical density estimates were provided by a trained breast-imaging radiologist. Regression analysis is performed and Pearson's correlation, r, and Cohen's kappa, kappa, are computed. The GLM PD% estimation model performed well on both processed (r=0.89, p<0.001) and raw (r=0.75, p<0.001) images. Model agreement with radiologist assigned density categories was also high for processed (kappa=0.79, p<0.001) and raw (kappa=0.76, p<0.001) images. Model-based prediction of breast PD% could allow for a reproducible estimation of breast density, providing a rapid risk assessment tool for clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Fowler, Erin E. E.
    Tiffenberg, Gail
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Pankratz, V. Shane
    Sellers, Thomas A.
    Heine, John J.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (01):
  • [2] Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data
    Celine M Vachon
    Erin EE Fowler
    Gail Tiffenberg
    Christopher G Scott
    V Shane Pankratz
    Thomas A Sellers
    John J Heine
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 15
  • [3] Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit
    Lu, Lee-Jane W.
    Nishino, Thomas K.
    Khamapirad, Tuenchit
    Grady, James J.
    Leonard, Morton H., Jr.
    Brunder, Donald G.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (16): : 4905 - 4921
  • [4] Image evaluation and breast density categories as a function of mammary positioning in full-field digital mammography
    Nakano, Irene Tomoko
    de Oliveira Salvador, Gabriel Lucca
    Schelin, Hugo Reuters
    Denyak, Valeriy
    Khoury, Helen Jamil
    Tacara, Silvio
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (07) : 868 - 874
  • [5] Should processed or raw image data be used in mammographic image quality analyses? A comparative study of three full-field digital mammography systems
    Borg, Mark
    Badr, Ishmail
    Royle, Gary
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2015, 163 (01) : 102 - 117
  • [6] Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation
    Keller, Brad M.
    Nathan, Diane L.
    Wang, Yan
    Zheng, Yuanjie
    Gee, James C.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Kontos, Despina
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (08) : 4903 - 4917
  • [7] Boosting Classification Performance in Computer Aided Diagnosis of Breast Masses in Raw Full-Field Digital Mammography Using Processed and Screen Film Images
    Kooi, Thijs
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2014, 9035
  • [8] Reader Variability in Breast Density Estimation from Full-Field Digital Mammograms: The Effect of Image Postprocessing on Relative and Absolute Measures
    Keller, Brad M.
    Nathan, Diane L.
    Gavenonis, Sara C.
    Chen, Jinbo
    Conant, Emily F.
    Kontos, Despina
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (05) : 560 - 568
  • [9] ACRIN PA 4006: Comparison of Full-Field Digital Mammography with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Image Acquisition in Relation to Screening Call-Back Rate.
    Conant, E. F.
    Maidment, A.
    Copit, D.
    Olson, C. B.
    Hecke, M. L.
    Gatsonis, C.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71
  • [10] Full-field digital mammography with grid-less acquisition and software-based scatter correction: Investigation of dose saving and image quality
    Fieselmann, Andreas
    Fischer, Daniel
    Hilal, Ghani
    Dennerlein, Frank
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    Uhlenbrock, Detlev
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2013, 8668