International Veterinary Bioequivalence Guideline Similarities and Differences Between Australia, Canada, Europe, Japan, New Zealand and the United States

被引:2
|
作者
Lainesse, Chantal [1 ]
机构
[1] IntegRxal Consulting Strategies, Saskatoon, SK S7K 3J8, Canada
来源
AAPS JOURNAL | 2012年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
bioequivalence; comparison; generic; international; veterinary drugs;
D O I
10.1208/s12248-012-9393-y
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Considering the diversity in physiology between species and the numerous dosage forms that exist in veterinary drug products, there are numerous complex issues that arise from the development and regulation of veterinary drugs for food-producing and companion animals. Generic drugs are no exception. The main objective of this article is to illustrate the current important similarities and differences between international veterinary bioequivalence guidelines. It is concluded that since important differences are found, these may lead to barriers in international data exchange and scientific confusion, hence fostering the need for a harmonization effort in developing consistent guidelines based on sound pharmacological and statistical principles for the approval of veterinary generic drugs around the world.
引用
收藏
页码:792 / 798
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] International Veterinary Bioequivalence Guideline Similarities and Differences Between Australia, Canada, Europe, Japan, New Zealand and the United States
    Chantal Lainesse
    [J]. The AAPS Journal, 2012, 14 : 792 - 798
  • [2] Use of Firearms in Terrorist Attacks: Differences Between the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand
    Tessler, Robert A.
    Mooney, Stephen J.
    Witt, Cordelie E.
    O'Connell, Kathleen
    Jenness, Jessica
    Vavilala, Monica S.
    Rivara, Frederick P.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 177 (12) : 1865 - 1868
  • [3] A comparison of the relationship between extraversion and argumentativeness in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand
    Croucher, Stephen M.
    Yotes, Tommy
    Ashwell, Doug
    Condon, Shawn M.
    [J]. COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPORTS, 2024, 41 (02) : 82 - 93
  • [4] THE PROPENSITY TO REFORM: THE UNITED STATES, AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND, AND CANADA COMPARED
    Rosenof, Theodore
    [J]. HISTORIAN, 2010, 72 (01): : 38 - 66
  • [5] Agricultural waste management in Canada, United States, New Zealand and Australia
    Friesen, B.
    [J]. XXI INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON PLASTICS IN AGRICULTURE: AGRICULTURE, PLASTICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 1252 : 93 - 96
  • [6] WOMEN IN MEDICINE - AUSTRALIA, NEW-ZEALAND, CANADA, AND UNITED-STATES
    BROGAN, DR
    [J]. WOMEN & HEALTH, 1982, 7 (01) : 5 - 14
  • [7] CANADA, UNITED-STATES, AUSTRALIA AND NEW-ZEALAND - NUPTIALITY TRENDS
    FESTY, P
    [J]. POPULATION STUDIES-A JOURNAL OF DEMOGRAPHY, 1973, 27 (03): : 479 - 492
  • [8] Leadership in animal welfare: A comparison of Canada with the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand
    Hewson, CJ
    [J]. CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE, 2004, 45 (11): : 944 - 950
  • [9] Towards social acceptability of genome-edited plants in industrialised countries? Emerging evidence from Europe, United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan
    Spoek, Armin
    Sprink, Thorben
    Allan, Andrew. C. C.
    Yamaguchi, Tomiko
    Daye, Christian
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENOME EDITING, 2022, 4
  • [10] Food guides reflect similarities and differences in dietary guidance in three countries (Japan, Canada, and the United States)
    Murphy, Suzanne P.
    Barr, Susan I.
    [J]. NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2007, 65 (04) : 141 - 148