Joint provision of income and employment support: Evidence from a crisis response in Uruguay

被引:0
|
作者
Escudero, Veronica [1 ]
Lopez Mourelo, Elva [2 ]
Pignatti, Clemente [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Int Labour Org ILO, Res Dept, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Int Labour Org ILO, Country Off Argentina, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Workfare programme; Conditional cash transfer; Social protection; Impact evaluation; Uruguay; SOCIAL PROTECTION; CASH TRANSFERS; PROGRAMS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105015
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Integrated approaches providing assistance to jobless individuals through the combination of income support and active labour market policies have been increasingly advocated in the policy debate, both by policy makers and international organizations. By helping people tackle immediate needs while promoting labour market reinsertion, these combined approaches are expected to improve labour market and social conditions in a sustainable manner. However, evidence on the effectiveness of this policy approach is extremely scant in emerging and developing economies. This paper studies a pivotal example of this policy trend through the evaluation of a public works programme provided alongside a cash transfer as part of a comprehensive social assistance programme that reached around 10 per cent of households in Uruguay between 2005 and 2007. We use rich administrative data of panel nature to study the effects of (i) participating in the public works programme (active component), (ii) receiving the cash transfer (income-support component), and (iii) benefiting jointly of the active and income-support programmes. Results on measures of labour market participation, employment quality, and civil society participation are non-significant across the board. Point estimates are nevertheless of the expected sign and of reasonable magnitude, suggesting that the programme came close to achieving its objective. Possible reasons of the limited effectiveness of the programme could include limited treatment intensity and lack of human capital accumulation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条