Comparison of Vane Type External Excitation and Free Air Turbulence Methods for Flutter Flight Testing

被引:0
|
作者
Hafeez, M. Usman [1 ]
Ajmal, M. [1 ]
Khan, Tanveer A. [1 ]
Khan, Zubair [1 ]
机构
[1] CESAT, Islamabad, Pakistan
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Structure excitation plays a key role in evaluating the stability of the aircraft during flutter flight test. Various techniques are used for the excitation of aircraft during flutter flight test. Each technique has its own merits and demerits depending upon the type and application of exciters. This paper describes the comparison of rotating cylinder vane type excitation system (external) with free air turbulence (natural). Different performance parameters like excitation force, frequency range and phase difference of the flutter exciters were evaluated based on the flight test data. Free air turbulence was able to excite low frequency modes (< 20 Hz) with small amplitudes. Whereas the rotating cylinder system excited the complete required range (up to 50 Hz) with significantly higher amplitudes. Major difference can be seen in the performance like high signal to noise ratio, suitable identification of elastic modes, appropriate in-phase and out-of-phase excitation to the aircraft as compared to free air turbulence. Rotating cylinder excitation systems is a more efficient way of doing flutter flight testing as it results in significant reduction in time of flight tests and better estimation of structural identification.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 140
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] ON METHODS OF RANDOM-EXCITATION FLIGHT FLUTTER TESTING
    JURICIC, D
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANGEWANDTE MATHEMATIK UND MECHANIK, 1967, S 47 : T87 - &
  • [2] ON FLIGHT FLUTTER TESTING - TEST OF FLUTTER STABILITY BY RANDOM EXCITATION METHOD
    JURICIC, D
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR FLUGWISSENSCHAFTEN, 1967, 15 (11): : 420 - &
  • [3] COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS TO CALCULATE EXTERNAL LOADS AT FLIGHT IN CONTINUOUS TURBULENCE
    Hevko, Bohdan
    Bondar, Yurij
    AVIATION, 2022, 26 (03) : 160 - 168
  • [5] Flutter Prediction for Flight/Wind-Tunnel Flutter Test Under Atmospheric Turbulence Excitation
    Zeng, Jie
    Kukreja, Sunil L.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2013, 50 (06): : 1696 - 1709
  • [6] Flight flutter modal parameters identification with atmospheric turbulence excitation based on wavelet transformation
    Bo, Zhang
    Zhongke, Shi
    Jianjun, Li
    Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2007, 20 (05): : 394 - 401
  • [7] Flight flutter modal parameters identification with atmospheric turbulence excitation based on wavelet transformation
    Zhang Bo
    Shi Zhongke
    Li Jianjun
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS, 2007, 20 (05) : 394 - 401
  • [8] In-flight modal analysis - a comparison between sweep and turbulence excitation
    Peeters, Bart
    De Troyer, Tim
    Guillaume, Patrick
    Van der Auweraer, Herman
    Proceedings of ISMA2006: International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Vols 1-8, 2006, : 1627 - 1641
  • [9] Development and Flight Testing of a Turbulence Mitigation System for Micro Air Vehicles
    Mohamed, A.
    Abdulrahim, M.
    Watkins, S.
    Clothier, R.
    JOURNAL OF FIELD ROBOTICS, 2016, 33 (05) : 639 - 660
  • [10] Comparison of free air space test methods
    Su, DL
    McCartney, D
    Wang, QF
    COMPOST SCIENCE & UTILIZATION, 2006, 14 (02) : 103 - 113