Coping resources in a sample of chronic low back pain patients. Evaluation of the questionnaire for back pain

被引:0
|
作者
Jegan, N. R. A. [1 ]
Viniol, A. [1 ]
Becker, A. [1 ]
Barth, J. [2 ]
Leonhardt, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Marburg, Abt Allgemeinmed & Familienmed, D-35043 Marburg, Germany
[2] Univ Bern, ISPM, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
来源
SCHMERZ | 2013年 / 27卷 / 05期
关键词
Back pain; General practice; Resilience; General physician setting; Secondary analysis; PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; FEAR; DEPRESSION; STRATEGIES; TRANSITION;
D O I
10.1007/s00482-013-1356-4
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The coping resources questionnaire for back pain (FBR) uses 12 items to measure the perceived helpfulness of different coping resources (CRs, social emotional support, practical help, knowledge, movement and relaxation, leisure and pleasure, spirituality and cognitive strategies). The aim of the study was to evaluate the instrument in a clinical patient sample assessed in a primary care setting. The study was a secondary evaluation of empirical data from a large cohort study in general practices. The 58 participating primary care practices recruited patients who reported chronic back pain in the consultation. Besides the FBR and a pain sketch, the patients completed scales measuring depression, anxiety, resilience, sociodemographic factors and pain characteristics. To allow computing of retested parameters the FBR was sent to some of the original participants again after 6 months (90% response rate). We calculated consistency and retest reliability coefficients as well as correlations between the FBR subscales and depression, anxiety and resilience scores to account for validity. By means of a cluster analysis groups with different resource profiles were formed. Results. For the study 609 complete FBR baseline data sets could be used for statistical analysis. The internal consistency scores ranged from alpha=0.58 to alpha=0.78 and retest reliability scores were between rTT=0.41 and rTT=0.63. Correlation with depression, fear and resilience ranged from r=-0.38 to r=0.42. The cluster analysis resulted in four groups with relatively homogenous intragroup profiles (high CRs, low spirituality, medium CRs, low CRs). The four groups differed significantly in fear and depression (the more inefficient the resources the higher the difference) as well as in resilience (the more inefficient the lower the difference). The group with low CRs also reported permanent pain with no relief. The groups did not otherwise differ. The FBR is an economic instrument that is suitable for practical use e.g. in primary care practices to identify strengths and deficits in the CRs of chronic pain patients that can then be specified in face to face consultation. However, due to the rather low reliability, the use of subscales for profile differentiation and follow-up measurement in individual diagnoses is limited.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 496
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A developed low back pain questionnaire: Use for care of patients with low back pain
    El Miedany, Y.
    Toth, M.
    Youssef, S.
    Hegazi, M. O.
    Ahmed, I.
    El Gaafary, M.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2008, 47 : II182 - II182
  • [2] Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain
    Pinheiro, Jocassia Silva
    Pontes-Silva, Andre
    Costa Araujo, Gabriel Gardhel
    Mendes, Leticia Padilha
    Pires, Flavio de Oliveira
    Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes, Cid Andre
    Dibai-Filho, Almir Vieira
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2021, 67 (08): : 1087 - 1092
  • [3] Low back pain and methods of coping with low back pain in nurses
    Gunduz, Cuneyt
    Sayilan, Aylin Aydin
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2021, 33 (04): : 243 - 252
  • [4] Sense of Coherence, Chronic Low Back Pain and Coping Comparing the Sense of Coherence of Patients with and without Chronic Low Back Pain in Consideration of Coping Strategies
    Galert, J., Jr.
    Kania, H.
    PHYSIOSCIENCE, 2008, 4 (04) : 178 - 183
  • [5] Evaluation of quality of life and neuropathic pain in patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire
    Hiyama, Akihiko
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    Katoh, Hiroyuki
    Sato, Masato
    Sakai, Daisuke
    Mochida, Joji
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (03) : 503 - 512
  • [6] Evaluation of quality of life and neuropathic pain in patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire
    Akihiko Hiyama
    Masahiko Watanabe
    Hiroyuki Katoh
    Masato Sato
    Daisuke Sakai
    Joji Mochida
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 503 - 512
  • [7] PAIN COPING STRATEGIES IN A DUTCH POPULATION OF CHRONIC LOW-BACK PAIN PATIENTS
    SPINHOVEN, P
    TERKUILE, MM
    LINSSEN, ACG
    GAZENDAM, B
    PAIN, 1989, 37 (01) : 77 - 83
  • [8] Validation of the French version of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire in chronic low back pain patients
    Marty, M
    Blotman, F
    Avouac, B
    Rozenberg, S
    Valat, JP
    REVUE DU RHUMATISME, 1998, 65 (02): : 126 - 134
  • [9] Low back pain and low back pain patients. A new clinical and therapeutic approach.
    Hamonet, C
    SEMAINE DES HOPITAUX, 1999, 75 (15-16): : 462 - 466
  • [10] Appraisal and coping processes among chronic low back pain patients
    Busch, H
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2005, 19 (04) : 396 - 402