Temporal resolution requirements for intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered by multileaf collimators

被引:10
|
作者
Budgell, GJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Christie Hosp NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 1999年 / 44卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/44/7/301
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Intensity modulated radiation therapy may be delivered via dynamic control of a multileaf collimator by defining dynamic leaf trajectories at a series of control points which are spaced at arbitrary intervals throughout an exposure. Leaves move linearly between the positions defined at the control points and hence leaf motion is a linear approximation to the planned trajectories. When many control points are used, very complex modulations can be defined accurately. If too few are used, dose errors are introduced which depend on the complexity of the modulation and the number of control points chosen. Proposed intensity modulations, of varying complexity, have been converted to trajectory plans where the number of equally spaced control points varied between 11 and 99. In each case the fluence map generated by the resulting leaf motions was computed, and this was quantitatively compared with the desired modulation by calculating the root mean square (RMS) error. It is shown that in no case can the RMS error be significantly reduced by increasing the number of control points beyond 50. Guidelines are derived such that compensators and simple modulations may be very accurately delivered with about 20 control points, moderately complex modulations require 30-35 control points and very complex modulations 50 control points. A similar analysis of the step and shoot technique suggests that very accurate deliveries are always achieved with a maximum of 25 equally weighted static fields and reasonable accuracy with 15 fields.
引用
收藏
页码:1581 / 1596
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with dynamic multileaf collimators
    Boyer, AL
    Yu, CX
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) : 48 - 59
  • [2] Concepts for shuttling multileaf collimators for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Webb, S
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (03): : 637 - 651
  • [3] Monitor chamber backscatter for intensity modulated radiation therapy using multileaf collimators
    Hounsell, AR
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (02): : 445 - 454
  • [4] Realization of intensity modulated radiation fields using multileaf collimators
    Kalinowski, T.
    [J]. General Theory of Information Transfer and Combinatorics, 2006, 4123 : 1010 - 1055
  • [5] Intensity modulated radiation therapy with multileaf collimators of different leaf widths:: a comparison of achievable dose distributions
    Nill, S
    Tücking, T
    Münter, MW
    Oelfke, U
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 75 (01) : 106 - 111
  • [6] A method of simulating dynamic multileaf collimators using Monte Carlo techniques for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Liu, HH
    Verhaegen, F
    Dong, L
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (09): : 2283 - 2298
  • [7] Delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimators
    Mohan, R
    Wu, Y
    Wu, QW
    [J]. GENERAL PRACTICE OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY PHYSICS IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2000, (26): : 113 - 135
  • [8] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a multileaf collimator
    Webb, S
    [J]. RADIATION RESEARCH, VOL 2, CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 660 - 663
  • [9] AN ANALYTICAL APPROACH TO SINGLE ARC INTENSITY MODULATED ARC THERAPY (IMAT) WITH DYNAMIC MULTILEAF COLLIMATORS
    Loeschel, R.
    Hoegele, W.
    Dobler, B.
    Cormack, R.
    Chin, L.
    Zygmanski, P.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S30 - S30
  • [10] Delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy using computer-controlled multileaf collimators with the CORVUS inverse treatment planning system
    Hill, RW
    Curran, BH
    Strait, JP
    Carol, MP
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE XIITH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE USE OF COMPUTERS IN RADIATION THERAPY, 1997, : 394 - 397