Stress Distribution of the Power Section Cup of Pipeline Inspection Gauges by Finite Element Method

被引:11
|
作者
Cao, Yu-Guang [1 ]
Zhen, Ying [2 ]
Shi, Yong-Jin [3 ]
Zhang, Shi-Hua [3 ]
Sun, Yong-Tai [3 ]
Nie, Wen-Jun [2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Prov Key Lab Safety Oil & Gas Storage & Transport, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Petr, Dept Engn Mech, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
[3] Drilling Technol Res Inst Shengli Oil Field, Dept Offshore Engn, Dongying 257017, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pipeline inspection gauges (PIGs); Power section cup; Large deformation; Interference fit; Three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) simulation; Contact analysis; Stress distribution; CONSTITUTIVE MODEL; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000308
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The pipeline inspection gauges (PIGs) are often blocked in actual operation. As the PIG ran in the straight pipeline, elbow, and anomaly, the large deformation and stress state of the power section cup were analyzed by a three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) simulation to provide a basis for solving the blockage problems. A rubber cylinder model was first established to simulate the interference fit to the pipeline. Numerical and analytical results were compared to verify the accuracy of the numerical method. Based on this method, the power section model with four cups was established and the contact-pair algorithm was adopted in order to simulate PIGs running in different locations of the pipeline. The radial stress and strain were subsequently obtained. Results show that when the PIG runs in a straight pipeline the radial stress of the outer edge of the cup is evenly distributed, and when the PIG runs in the elbow and anomaly the radial stress of the outer edge of the cup indicates a cardioid distribution. (C) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stress analysis of plain dent on pipeline based on finite element method
    Wu, Ying
    Zhang, Peng
    Xie, Yanping
    Hanjie Xuebao/Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2013, 34 (01): : 57 - 60
  • [2] Stress analysis of damaged submarine pipeline using finite element method
    Pal, B
    Salpekar, VY
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH (1999) INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL II, 1999, 1999, : 153 - 159
  • [3] Stress analysis of damaged submarine pipeline using finite element method
    Engineers India Ltd, New Delhi, India
    Proc Int Offshore Polar Eng Conf, (153-159):
  • [4] Deformation and stress analysis of cup on pipeline inspection gauge based on reverse measurement
    Chen, Zhong
    Qiu, Xiaoyang
    Yang, Lingling
    ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (07) : 2509 - 2526
  • [5] Architecting the finite element method pipeline for the GPU
    Fu, Zhisong
    Lewis, T. James
    Kirby, Robert M.
    Whitaker, Ross T.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2014, 257 : 195 - 211
  • [6] A simplified finite element model for generating MFL signals for pipeline inspection
    Cui, W
    Huang, SL
    Zhao, W
    Burd, JF
    ISTM/2005: 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TEST AND MEASUREMENT, VOLS 1-9, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 4943 - 4946
  • [7] Analysis of Magnetic Flux Leakage Signals of Instrumented Pipeline Inspection Gauge Using Finite Element Method
    Keshwani, Rajesh T.
    IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2009, 55 (02) : 73 - 82
  • [8] Finite element stress analysis of mandible by applicating chin cup
    Tseng, YT
    Lin, CL
    Chang, CH
    Yen, CH
    Su, MZ
    Chang, FHF
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 327 - 327
  • [9] Modeling of potential distribution of subsea pipeline under cathodic protection by finite element method
    Marcassoli, P.
    Bonetti, A.
    Lazzari, L.
    Ormellese, M.
    MATERIALS AND CORROSION-WERKSTOFFE UND KORROSION, 2015, 66 (07): : 619 - 626
  • [10] Testing and analysis of the inner stress in adhesive coating layer using strain gauges and finite element method
    Zheng, XL
    You, M
    Zheng, Y
    Yu, HZ
    Yang, CM
    RESIDUAL STRESSES VII, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 490-491 : 667 - 671