Cold Ethanol Extraction of Cannabinoids and Terpenes from Cannabis Using Response Surface Methodology: Optimization and Comparative Study

被引:8
|
作者
Addo, Philip Wiredu [1 ]
Sagili, Sai Uday Kumar Reddy [1 ]
Bilodeau, Samuel Eichhorn [2 ]
Gladu-Gallant, Frederick-Alexandre [2 ]
MacKenzie, Douglas A. A. [3 ]
Bates, Jennifer [3 ]
McRae, Garnet [3 ]
MacPherson, Sarah [1 ]
Paris, Maxime [2 ]
Raghavan, Vijaya [1 ]
Orsat, Valerie [1 ]
Lefsrud, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Bioresource Engn Dept, Ste Anne Debellevue,Macdonald Campus, Montreal, PQ H9X 3V9, Canada
[2] EXKA Inc, 7625 Route Arthur Sauve, Mirabel, PQ J7N 2R6, Canada
[3] Natl Res Council Canada, Metrol, 1200 Montreal Rd, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
来源
MOLECULES | 2022年 / 27卷 / 24期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
cannabis; cannabinoids; cold ethanol; delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol; extraction; SECONDARY METABOLITES; ASSISTED EXTRACTION; PLANT; ANTIOXIDANTS; TEMPERATURE; SOLVENT; MARC;
D O I
10.3390/molecules27248780
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Efficient cannabis biomass extraction can increase yield while reducing costs and minimizing waste. Cold ethanol extraction was evaluated to maximize yield and concentrations of cannabinoids and terpenes at different temperatures. Central composite rotatable design was used to optimize two independent factors: sample-to-solvent ratio (1:2.9 to 1:17.1) and extraction time (5.7 min-34.1 min). With response surface methodology, predicted optimal conditions at different extraction temperatures were a cannabis-to-ethanol ratio of 1:15 and a 10 min extraction time. With these conditions, yields (g 100 g dry matter(-1)) were 18.2, 19.7, and 18.5 for -20 degrees C, -40 degrees C and room temperature, respectively. Compared to the reference ground sample, tetrahydrocannabinolic acid changed from 17.9 (g 100 g dry matter(-1)) to 15, 17.5, and 18.3 with an extraction efficiency of 83.6%, 97.7%, 102.1% for -20 degrees C, -40 degrees C, and room temperature, respectively. Terpene content decreased by 54.1% and 32.2% for extraction at -20 degrees C and room temperature, respectively, compared to extraction at -40 degrees C. Principal component analysis showed that principal component 1 and principal component 2 account for 88% and 7.31% of total variance, respectively, although no significant differences in cold ethanol extraction at different temperatures were observed.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Microwave- and Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Cannabinoids and Terpenes from Cannabis Using Response Surface Methodology
    Addo, Philip Wiredu
    Sagili, Sai Uday Kumar Reddy
    Bilodeau, Samuel Eichhorn
    Gladu-Gallant, Frederick-Alexandre
    MacKenzie, Douglas A.
    Bates, Jennifer
    McRae, Garnet
    MacPherson, Sarah
    Paris, Maxime
    Raghavan, Vijaya
    Orsat, Valerie
    Lefsrud, Mark
    [J]. MOLECULES, 2022, 27 (24):
  • [2] Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Cannabinoids in Hemp Nut Using Response Surface Methodology: Optimization and Comparative Study
    Chang, Chih-Wei
    Yen, Ching-Chi
    Wu, Ming-Tsang
    Hsu, Mei-Chich
    Wu, Yu-Tse
    [J]. MOLECULES, 2017, 22 (11):
  • [3] Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Cannabinoids from Cannabis Sativa L. Optimized by Response Surface Methodology
    Agarwal, Charu
    Mathe, Katalin
    Hofmann, Tamas
    Csoka, Levente
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2018, 83 (03) : 700 - 710
  • [4] Optimization of extraction using surface response methodology and quantification of cannabinoids in female inflorescences of marijuana (Cannabis sativa L.) at three altitudinal floors of Peru
    Espinoza-Silva, Clara
    Pascual, Erika
    Delgadillo, Yacnehs
    Flores, Omar R.
    Artica, Luis M.
    Marmolejo, Doris
    Banos-Medina, Lilian
    [J]. OPEN AGRICULTURE, 2023, 8 (01):
  • [5] Optimization of wiped-film short path molecular distillation for recovery of cannabinoids from cannabis oil using response surface methodology
    Sagili, Sai Uday Kumar Reddy
    Addo, Philip Wiredu
    Gladu-Gallant, Frederick-Alexandre
    Bilodeau, Samuel Eichhorn
    MacPherson, Sarah
    Paris, Maxime
    Lefsrud, Mark
    Orsata, Valerie
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2023, 195
  • [6] Optimization of hot water extraction of roselle juice using response surface methodology: a comparative study with other extraction methods
    Wong, PK
    Yusof, S
    Ghazali, HM
    Man, YBC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2003, 83 (12) : 1273 - 1278
  • [7] Optimization of an ethanol/water-based sinapine extraction from mustard bran using Response Surface Methodology
    Reungoat, Valentin
    Gaudin, Morvan
    Flourat, Amandine L.
    Isidore, Emilie
    Mouterde, Louis M. M.
    Allais, Florent
    Ducatel, Helene
    Ioannou, Irina
    [J]. FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING, 2020, 122 : 322 - 331
  • [8] Optimization of Ethanol Production from Mango Peels using Response Surface Methodology
    Ghani, Muhammad Ridzuan Abdul
    Ching, Oh Pei
    [J]. PROCESS AND ADVANCED MATERIALS ENGINEERING, 2014, 625 : 766 - 769
  • [9] Green extraction of agar from Hypnea pannosa seaweed: A comparative study of different techniques and optimization using response surface methodology
    Deepika, B.
    Ganesan, P.
    Sivaraman, B.
    Neethiselvan, N.
    Padmavathy, P.
    [J]. ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2024, 82
  • [10] Optimization of ethanol based extraction of phenolics from Ocimum sanctum flowers by response surface methodology
    Janarny, G.
    Ranaweera, K. K. D. S.
    Gunathilake, K. D. P. P.
    [J]. BIOCATALYSIS AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 45