Omental Packing with Continuous Suction Drainage Following Abdominoperineal Resection

被引:6
|
作者
Oida, Takatsugu [1 ]
Kawasaki, Atsushi
Mimatsu, Kenji
Kano, Hisao
Kuboi, Youichi
Fukino, Nobutada
Kida, Kazutoshi
Amano, Sadao [2 ]
机构
[1] Social Insurance Yokohama Cent Hosp, Dept Surg, Naka Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2318553, Japan
[2] Nihon Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Omental packing; Abdominoperineal rectal resection; Perineal wound management; Continuous suction drainage; PERINEAL WOUND COMPLICATIONS; PELVIC EXENTERATION; GREATER OMENTUM; MUSCLE FLAPS; RECTUM; OMENTOPLASTY; MANAGEMENT; CARCINOMA; EXCISION; CLOSURE;
D O I
10.5754/hge09325
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aims: Primary closure of the perineum along with drainage after abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer is a widely accepted procedure but is associated with non-healing of the perineal wound a major complication. We evaluated the efficacy of omental packing and continuous suction drainage after abdominoperineal resection. Methodology: We retrospectively studied 45 patients with adenocarcinoma of the lower rectum who underwent abdominoperineal resection, either without omental packing (NOP group) or with omental packing and continuous suction drainage (OPCD group). A pedicled omentum supplied by the epiploic arcade was conducted and drawn down through the perineal wound, over the small intestine and into the pelvis. Drains were placed on both sides of the pelvis through the perineal wall and continuous suction was performed. Results: Perineal wound infection was significantly more frequent in the NOP group (32%) than in the OPCD group (5%). Ileus was not observed in the OPCD group. The duration of hospitalization was shorter in the OPCD group (17.8 +/- 4.2 days) than in the NOP group (21.0 +/- 9.1 days). Conclusions: Omental packing with continuous suction is useful to prevent non-healing of the perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 383
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] USE OF OMENTAL PEDICLE GRAFTS IN ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION
    FERGUSON, CM
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 1990, 56 (05) : 310 - 312
  • [3] ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION FOLLOWING ANTERIOR RESECTION
    SANNELLA, NA
    CANCER, 1976, 38 (01) : 378 - 381
  • [4] Omental flaps in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer
    Welten, Vanessa M.
    Fields, Adam C.
    Lu, Pamela
    Goldberg, Joel E.
    Irani, Jennifer
    Bleday, Ronald
    Melnitchouk, Nelya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (07) : 1227 - 1232
  • [5] Omental flaps in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer
    Vanessa M. Welten
    Adam C. Fields
    Pamela Lu
    Joel E. Goldberg
    Jennifer Irani
    Ronald Bleday
    Nelya Melnitchouk
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2019, 34 : 1227 - 1232
  • [6] Packing of the pelvis following abdominoperineal excision of the rectum
    Mishra, A.
    Guy, R.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2015, 97 (03) : 240 - 240
  • [7] PERINEAL HERNIA FOLLOWING ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION
    HULLSIEK, HE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1956, 92 (05): : 735 - 738
  • [8] SPERMATOCELE FOLLOWING ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION AND RADIOTHERAPY
    LELCUK, S
    YAVEZ, H
    KLAUSNER, JM
    ROZIN, RR
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1986, 29 (05) : 355 - 356
  • [9] UROLOGIC COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION
    EICKENBERG, HU
    AMIN, M
    KLOMPUS, W
    LICH, R
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1976, 115 (02): : 180 - 182
  • [10] CONTINUOUS SUMP-SUCTION DRAINAGE OF PELVIS AFTER LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION - REAPPRAISAL
    SEHAPAYA.S
    MCNATT, M
    CARTER, HG
    BAILEY, W
    BALDWIN, A
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1973, 16 (06) : 485 - 489