Contrasting responses to boron deficiency in barley and wheat

被引:17
|
作者
Wongmo, J [1 ]
Jamjod, S [1 ]
Rerkasem, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agron, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
关键词
barley; boron deficiency; boron efficiency; genotypic variation; wheat;
D O I
10.1023/B:PLSO.0000020946.76017.20
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
To determine if boron (B) deficiency, commonly reported to depress grain set in wheat, has the same effect in barley, a set of experiments compared five wheat and seven barley genotypes at various B levels in sand culture and in the field. In sand culture, plants were grown with levels of added B, from 0 to 10 muM. In the field, they were sown in a low B soil [0.15 mg hot water soluble (HWS) B kg(-1)] with three B treatments (nil, 2 t lime ha(-1), 1 kg B ha(-1)). In sand culture without added B, the genotypes ranged in grain set index (GSI) from 0 to 93% for wheat and 0 to 67% for barley. Boron concentration of the spike and flag leaf at booting in wheat and barley correlated (r = 0.8 - 0.9, P < 0.01) with the effect of B on GSI. Grain set was the only response, measurable in decreased number of grain spike(-1) and grains spikelet(-1), to low B in wheat. In barley, low B also depressed the number of spikelet spike(-1) by 23 to 75% and induced a 'rat-tail' symptom of terminal spikelet degeneration. There was a weak correlation between spike and flag leaf B and the effect of B on spike size in barley ( r = 0.47 and 0.37, respectively, P < 0.1). In some barley genotypes, the low B level that depressed grain set sometimes also delayed spike emergence and depressed the number of spikes plant(-1) but sometimes increased tillering and dry weight of straw. These results demonstrate that the phenotype of plant response to low B is more complex in barley than wheat and may require different strategies for managing B nutrition of barley including different approaches for selecting B efficient genotypes.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 110
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contrasting responses to boron deficiency in barley and wheat
    J. Wongmo
    S. Jamjod
    B. Rerkasem
    Plant and Soil, 2004, 259 : 103 - 110
  • [2] Boron accumulation and partitioning in wheat cultivars with contrasting tolerance to boron deficiency
    K. D. Subedi
    P. J. Gregory
    M. J. Gooding
    Plant and Soil, 1999, 214 : 141 - 152
  • [3] Boron accumulation and partitioning in wheat cultivars with contrasting tolerance to boron deficiency
    Subedi, KD
    Gregory, PJ
    Gooding, MJ
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1999, 214 (1-2) : 141 - 152
  • [4] RESPONSES OF WHEAT AND BARLEY GENOTYPES TO TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS OF SOIL BORON
    PAULL, JG
    CARTWRIGHT, B
    RATHJEN, AJ
    EUPHYTICA, 1988, 39 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [5] BORON DEFICIENCY IN BARLEY
    SIMOJOKI, P
    ANNALES AGRICULTURAE FENNIAE, 1991, 30 (03): : 389 - 405
  • [6] Boron deficiency responses on nutrients composition in brachypodium distachyon, a model for wheat
    Pandey, Anamika
    Khan, Mohd Kamran
    Hamurcu, Mehmet
    Gezgin, Sait
    Hakki, Erdogan Esref
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 256 : S39 - S39
  • [7] Physiological and Proteomic Dissection of the Responses of Two Contrasting Wheat Genotypes to Nitrogen Deficiency
    Karim, Mohammad Rezaul
    Wang, Ruonan
    Zheng, Lu
    Dong, Xiaoying
    Shen, Renfang
    Lan, Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2020, 21 (06)
  • [8] Boron deficiency in wheat: a review
    Rerkasem, B
    Jamjod, S
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2004, 89 (2-3) : 173 - 186
  • [9] Physiological, Biochemical, and Transcriptomic Responses to Boron Toxicity in Leaf and Root Tissues of Contrasting Wheat Cultivars
    Kayihan, Ceyhun
    Oz, Mehmet Tufan
    Eyidogan, Fusun
    Yucel, Meral
    Oktem, Huseyin Avni
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTER, 2017, 35 (01) : 97 - 109
  • [10] Physiological, Biochemical, and Transcriptomic Responses to Boron Toxicity in Leaf and Root Tissues of Contrasting Wheat Cultivars
    Ceyhun Kayıhan
    Mehmet Tufan Öz
    Füsun Eyidoğan
    Meral Yücel
    Hüseyin Avni Öktem
    Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 2017, 35 : 97 - 109