Assessment of Prospectively Assigned Likert Scores for Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer

被引:33
|
作者
Costa, Daniel N. [1 ]
Lotan, Yair [2 ]
Rofsky, Neil M. [1 ]
Roehrborn, Claus [2 ]
Liu, Alexander [1 ]
Hornberger, Brad [2 ]
Xi, Yin [1 ]
Francis, Franto [3 ]
Pedrosa, Ivan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Urol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Pathol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2016年 / 195卷 / 01期
关键词
early detection of cancer; risk assessment; prostatic neoplasms; biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; SCORING SYSTEMS; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; GUIDANCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.080
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We assess the performance of prospectively assigned magnetic resonance imaging based Likert scale scores for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, and analyze the pre-biopsy imaging variables associated with increased cancer detection using targeted magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective review of prospectively generated data including men with abnormal multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (at least 1 Likert score 3 or greater lesion) who underwent subsequent targeted magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy, we determined the association between different imaging variables (Likert score, lesion size, lesion location, prostate volume, radiologist experience) and targeted biopsy positivity rate. We also compared the detection of clinically significant cancer according to Likert scale scores. Tumors with high volume (50% or more of any core) Gleason score 3+4 or any tumor with greater Gleason score were considered clinically significant. Each lesion served as the elementary unit for analysis. We used logistic regression for univariate and multivariate (stepwise selection) analysis to assess for an association between targeted biopsy positivity rate and each tested variable. The relationship between Likert scale and Gleason score was evaluated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: A total of 161 men with 244 lesions met the study eligibility criteria. Targeted biopsies diagnosed cancer in 41% (66 of 161) of the men and 41% (99 of 244) of the lesions. The Likert score was the strongest predictor of targeted biopsy positivity (OR 3.7, p < 0.0001). Other imaging findings associated with a higher targeted biopsy positivity rate included smaller prostate volume (OR 0.7, p < 0.01), larger lesion size (OR 2.2, p < 0.001) and anterior location (OR 2.0, p = 0.01). On multiple logistic regression analysis Likert score, lesion size and prostate volume were significant predictors of targeted biopsy positivity. Higher Likert scores were also associated with increased detection of clinically significant tumors (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The Likert scale score used to convey the degree of suspicion on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is the strongest predictor of targeted biopsy positivity and of the presence of clinically significant tumor.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 87
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Targeted Biopsies Noninferior to Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Systematic Biopsies for the Detection of Prostate Cancer?
    Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry
    Portalez, Daniel
    Bruguiere, Eric
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Malavaud, Bernard
    Mozer, Pierre
    Fiard, Gaelle
    Cornud, Francois
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (04): : 1069 - 1075
  • [2] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided In-bore and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsies: An Adjusted Comparison of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate
    Costa, Daniel N.
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    de Leon, Alberto Diaz
    Lotan, Yair
    Xi, Yin
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Freifeld, Yuval
    Margulis, Vitaly
    Raj, Ganesh
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Hornberger, Brad
    Desai, Neil
    Bagrodia, Aditya
    Francis, Franto
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (04): : 397 - 404
  • [3] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy of the Prostate-An Update
    Das, Chandan J.
    Razik, Abdul
    Sharma, Sanjay
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 53 (03) : 219 - 226
  • [4] The Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies with Conventional Transrectal Biopsies in Prostate Cancer Detection
    Baba, Dursun
    Balik, Ahmet Yildirim
    Yuksel, Alpaslan
    Senoglu, Yusuf
    [J]. UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2021, 20 (04): : 210 - 214
  • [5] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsies increase the rate of cancer detection in populations with a low incidence of prostate cancer
    Kaushal, Rohit
    Das, Chandan J.
    Singh, Prabhjot
    Dogra, Prem Nath
    Kumar, Rajeev
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2019, 60 (03) : 156 - 161
  • [6] Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound image fusion guidance of prostate biopsies: current status, challenges and future perspectives
    Boesen, Lars
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 53 (2-3) : 89 - 96
  • [7] Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound cognitive fusion targeted biopsy on the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a research of 614 cases in single center
    Li D.
    Liu Y.
    Li Z.
    Li S.
    Shan G.
    Yao L.
    [J]. Shengwu Yixue Gongchengxue Zazhi/Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 37 (02): : 225 - 229
  • [8] Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion focal cryotherapy of the prostate: A prospective development study
    Valerio, Massimo
    Shah, Taimur Tariq
    Shah, Paras
    Mccartan, Neil
    Emberton, Mark
    Arya, Manit
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 35 (04) : 150.e1 - 150.e7
  • [9] Prostate cancer detection using magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy: A retrospective cohort study
    Pratihar, Sarbartha Kumar
    Khanna, Ashish
    Vasudeo, Vivek
    Gupta, Rahul
    Saurabh, Nikhil
    Kumar, Bhuwan
    Ali, Mujahid
    Akotkar, Shravika S.
    Rawal, Sudhir Kumar
    Singh, Amitabh
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 39 (04) : 297 - 302
  • [10] Detection of anterior prostate cancer using a magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy in cases with initial biopsy and history of systematic biopsies
    Abe, Masakazu
    Takata, Ryo
    Ikarashi, Daiki
    Sekiguchi, Kie
    Tamura, Daichi
    Maekawa, Shigekatsu
    Kato, Renpei
    Kanehira, Mitsugu
    Ujiie, Takashi
    Obara, Wataru
    [J]. PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 11 (04) : 212 - 217