An Alternative One-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty Technique: For the Chronic Infected Total Hip

被引:2
|
作者
Kotecki, Keith [1 ]
Hoang, Victor [1 ]
LeCavalier, Daniel [1 ]
Bradford, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Valley Hosp Med Ctr, Orthopaed Surg, Las Vegas, NV 89106 USA
[2] Nevada Orthoped & Spine Ctr, Orthopaed Surg, Las Vegas, NV USA
关键词
tha; total hip arthroplasty; pji; prosthetic joint infection; 1-stage exchange; chronic hip infection; 2-STAGE REVISION; REPLACEMENT; CEMENT; BIOFILMS; SPACERS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.11138
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background There are various algorithms for the treatment of prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Currently, a two-stage hip exchange is considered the "gold standard" of care for treatment of chronic hip PJIs. However, there has been recent debate whether a one- or two-stage exchange offers the correct treatment. One-stage exchange arthroplasty has particularly gained interest due to less morbidity, mortality, and functional impairment. Methods In a retrospective case series, the outcome of patients with chronic hip PJIs treated with our one-stage exchange arthroplasty was analyzed. Between January 2015 and January 2020, eight patients underwent a one-stage exchange hip arthroplasty by a single surgeon at a single institution for a chronically infected total hip arthroplasty (THA). Original diagnosis of PJI was made in accordance with the 2011 version of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. The femoral stem was cemented with antibiotic-impregnated cement, and the polyethylene acetabular liner was cemented directly onto the acetabular bone with antibiotic-impregnated cement. Results Of the eight patients, three were female and five were male with a mean age of 70.5 years (SD 11.2, range 53-87). Six patients (75%) had infection eradication with retention of a stable implant and no additional surgery at a mean follow-up of 35.7 months (range 17-50). One patient (12.5%) underwent closed reduction for a dislocated THA at one month; however, this patient remained infection-free at the most recent follow-up of 41 months. One patient (12.5%) who was the oldest patient (87 years) died 18 days postoperatively. Overall, all living patients (87.5%) retained their one-stage exchange THA. One patient (12.5%, CI 95% 0.3-52.7) required additional surgery in the form of a closed reduction and zero patients (0.0%, CI 95% 0.0-36.9) required additional open surgery. Conclusion Single-stage exchange arthroplasty with an antibiotic- impregnated cemented femoral stem and antibiotic-impregnated cemented polyethylene acetabular liner may be a useful option for the treatment of chronic hip PJIs. Our case series provides evidence that infection eradication and function preservation are possible using our one-stage exchange arthroplasty technique in a chronically infected THA. However, a multi-center study with randomization is necessary to further validate our results.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] One-Stage Revision for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Zahar, Akos
    Gehrke, Thorsten A.
    [J]. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 47 (01) : 11 - +
  • [2] ONE-STAGE REVISION OF INFECTED CEMENTED TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY
    WROBLEWSKI, BM
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1986, (211) : 103 - 107
  • [3] One-Stage Revision of Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty with Bone Graft
    Rudelli, Sergio
    Uip, David
    Honda, Emerson
    Lima, Ana Lucia L. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (08): : 1165 - 1177
  • [4] Tantalum Acetabular Augments in One-stage Exchange of Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case-control Study
    Klatte, Till Orla
    Kendoff, Daniel
    Sabihi, Reza
    Kamath, Atul F.
    Rueger, Johannes M.
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (07): : 1443 - 1448
  • [5] ONE-STAGE REIMPLANTATION FOR INFECTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
    GOKSAN, SB
    FREEMAN, MAR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1992, 74 (01): : 78 - 82
  • [6] One-stage versus two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Navraj S. Nagra
    Thomas W. Hamilton
    Sameer Ganatra
    David W. Murray
    Hemant Pandit
    [J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 3106 - 3114
  • [7] One-stage versus two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Nagra, Navraj S.
    Hamilton, Thomas W.
    Ganatra, Sameer
    Murray, David W.
    Pandit, Hemant
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (10) : 3106 - 3114
  • [8] One-stage cementless revision arthroplasty for infected hip replacements
    Yoo, Jeong Joon
    Kwon, Young Sam
    Koo, Kyung-Hoi
    Yoon, Kang Sup
    Kim, Young-Min
    Kim, Hee Joong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (05) : 1195 - 1201
  • [9] One-stage cementless revision arthroplasty for infected hip replacements
    Jeong Joon Yoo
    Young Sam Kwon
    Kyung-Hoi Koo
    Kang Sup Yoon
    Young-Min Kim
    Hee Joong Kim
    [J]. International Orthopaedics, 2009, 33 : 1195 - 1201
  • [10] Routine one-stage exchange for chronic infection after total hip replacement
    Jean-Yves Jenny
    Régis Lengert
    Yann Diesinger
    Jeannot Gaudias
    Cyril Boeri
    Jean-François Kempf
    [J]. International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 2477 - 2481