Decision Modeling for Manufacturing Sustainability with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

被引:15
|
作者
Ocampo, Lanndon A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cebu Technol Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Corner MJ Cuenco Ave & R Palma St, Cebu 6000, Philippines
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; fuzzy set theory; manufacturing strategy; sustainable manufacturing; hierarchical decision-making; STRATEGY; BUSINESS; IMPLEMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; BARRIERS; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1177/0972150917736990
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article intends to integrate sustainability and the classical manufacturing strategy (MS) into a coherent hierarchical decision-making framework that identifies the content of a sustainable MS using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (fuzzy AHP). Instead of using the traditional fundamental scale of the AHP, linguistic variables with equivalent triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs) are used to elucidate judgement of elements in pairwise comparisons. AHP, as a widely adopted tool in multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problems, effectively handles the subjectivity and comprehensiveness of decision-making complexity that is structured hierarchically. Domain experts in MS and sustainability were asked to elicit judgement in AHP pairwise comparison approach. Results show the content strategy of the nine decision categories in manufacturing that addresses sustainability and competitiveness. A priority list of decisions is also presented which may guide decision-makers in resource allocation, medium-and long-range planning, and in formulating strategic initiatives. The main contribution of this article is the formulation of a sustainable MS from a hybrid approach that captures uncertainty and subjectivity in decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 41
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Computing sustainable manufacturing index with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
    Ocampo, Lanndon A.
    Clark, Eppie E.
    Promentilla, Michael Angelo B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING, 2016, 9 (05) : 305 - 314
  • [2] Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Faceshield Bracket Manufacturing by Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Taddese, Getasew
    Durieux, Severine
    Duc, Emmanuel
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [3] Trust modeling based on a combination of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy VIKOR
    Ashtiani, Mehrdad
    Azgomi, Mohammad Abdollahi
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 20 (01) : 399 - 421
  • [4] Trust modeling based on a combination of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy VIKOR
    Mehrdad Ashtiani
    Mohammad Abdollahi Azgomi
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2016, 20 : 399 - 421
  • [5] Bank Credit Decision Analysis Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Zhao, Di
    Lin, Fuan
    Gu, Ruonan
    Peng, Haoran
    Yan, Tingting
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC 2021), 2021, : 3853 - 3858
  • [6] Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based group decision support system to select and evaluate new manufacturing technologies
    Srihari Jaganathan
    Jinson J. Erinjeri
    Jun-ing Ker
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2007, 32 : 1253 - 1262
  • [7] Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based group decision support system to select and evaluate new manufacturing technologies
    Jaganathan, Srihari
    Erinjeri, Jinson J.
    Ker, Jun-ing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 32 (11-12): : 1253 - 1262
  • [8] Group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process by hesitant fuzzy numbers
    Ranjbar, Mahdi
    Effati, Sohrab
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [9] Group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process by hesitant fuzzy numbers
    Mahdi Ranjbar
    Sohrab Effati
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13
  • [10] Comparison of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (f-AHP) for the Sustainability Assessment of a Water Supply Project
    Natarajan N.
    Vasudevan M.
    Dineshkumar S.K.
    Anuja R.
    [J]. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 2022, 103 (4) : 1029 - 1039