A comparison of human chorionic gonadotropin and luteinizing hormone releasing hormone on the induction of spermiation and amplexus in the American toad (Anaxyrus americanus)

被引:31
|
作者
Kouba, Andrew J. [1 ]
delBarco-Trillo, Javier [2 ,4 ]
Vance, Carrie K. [3 ]
Milam, Callie [1 ]
Carr, Meghan [1 ]
机构
[1] Memphis Zoo, Conservat & Res Dept, Memphis, TN 38112 USA
[2] Univ Memphis, Dept Biol, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Biochem & Mol Biol Dept, Mississippi State, MS 39759 USA
[4] Museo Nacl Ciencias Nat CSIC, Madrid 28006, Spain
来源
关键词
Amphibian; Behavior; Hormones; Sperm; Toad; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; AMPHIBIAN CONSERVATION; BUFO-AMERICANUS; FROG; BEHAVIOR; BAXTERI;
D O I
10.1186/1477-7827-10-59
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Captive breeding programs for endangered amphibian species often utilize exogenous hormones for species that are difficult to breed. The purpose of our study was to compare the efficacy of two different hormones at various concentrations on sperm production, quantity and quality over time in order to optimize assisted breeding. Methods: Male American toads (Anaxyrus americanus) were divided into three separate treatment groups, with animals in each group rotated through different concentrations of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analog (LHRH; 0.1, 1.0, 4.0 and 32 micrograms/toad), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; 50, 100, 200, and 300 IU), or the control over 24 hours. We evaluated the number of males that respond by producing spermic urine, the sperm concentration, percent motility, and quality of forward progression. We also evaluated the effects of hCG and LHRH on reproductive behavior as assessed by amplexus. Data were analyzed using the Generalized Estimating Equations incorporating repeated measures over time and including the main effects of treatment and time, and the treatment by time interaction. Results: The hormone hCG was significantly more effective at stimulating spermiation in male Anaxyrus americanus than LHRH and showed a dose-dependent response in the number of animals producing sperm. At the most effective hCG dose (300 IU), 100% of the male toads produced sperm, compared to only 35% for the best LHRH dose tested (4.0 micrograms). In addition to having a greater number of responders (P < 0.05), the 300 IU hCG treatment group had a much higher average sperm concentration (P < 0.05) than the treatment group receiving 4.0 micrograms LHRH. In contrast, these two treatments did not result in significant differences in sperm motility or quality of forward progressive motility. However, more males went into amplexus when treated with LHRH vs. hCG (90% vs. 75%) by nine hours post-administration. Conclusion: There is a clear dichotomy between the two hormones' physiological responses on gamete production and stimulation of amplexus. Understanding how these two hormones influence physiology and reproductive behaviors in amphibians will have direct bearing on establishing similar breeding protocols for endangered species.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of human chorionic gonadotropin and luteinizing hormone releasing hormone on the induction of spermiation and amplexus in the American toad (Anaxyrus americanus)
    Andrew J Kouba
    Javier delBarco-Trillo
    Carrie K Vance
    Callie Milam
    Meghan Carr
    [J]. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 10
  • [2] Investigating patterns in the spermiation response of eight Australian frogs administered human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRHa)
    Silla, Aimee J.
    Roberts, J. D.
    [J]. GENERAL AND COMPARATIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 179 (01) : 128 - 136
  • [3] A comparison of human chorionic gonadotropin and luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogue for ovulation induction in black sea bass Centropristis striata (Linnaeus, 1758)
    Denson, Michael R.
    Jenkins, Wallace E.
    Berlinsky, David L.
    Smith, Theodore I. J.
    [J]. AQUACULTURE RESEARCH, 2007, 38 (09) : 918 - 925
  • [4] INFLUENCE OF HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN ON RESPONSE OF LUTEINIZING-HORMONE TO LUTEINIZING-HORMONE RELEASING HORMONE IN GONADECTOMIZED WOMEN
    MIYAKE, A
    AONO, T
    TANIZAWA, O
    KINUGASA, T
    KURACHI, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1977, 74 (03) : 499 - 500
  • [5] DIURNAL FLUCTUATIONS OF TESTOSTERONE AND LUTEINIZING-HORMONE IN RAM - EFFECT OF HUMAN CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN AND GONADOTROPIN RELEASING HORMONE
    FALVO, RE
    BUHL, AE
    HUNZICKER, ME
    FOXCROFT, GR
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 1973, 9 (01) : 101 - 102
  • [6] ACTIVE IMMUNIZATION OF HEIFERS AGAINST LUTEINIZING-HORMONE-RELEASING HORMONE, HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN AND BOVINE LUTEINIZING-HORMONE
    JOHNSON, HE
    DEAVILA, DM
    CHANG, CF
    REEVES, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1988, 66 (03) : 719 - 726
  • [7] The histological effect of the human chorionic gonadotropin and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone on experimental cryptorchidism in rats
    Vigueras, RM
    Reyes, G
    Cuevas, JO
    Rojas, JC
    Merchant-Larios, H
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FORTY-SECOND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN PHARMACOLOGY SOCIETY, 1999, 42 : 71 - 73
  • [8] LUTEOLYSIS INDUCED BY A LUTEINIZING-HORMONE-RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST IS PREVENTED BY HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN
    BERGQUIST, C
    NILLIUS, SJ
    WIDE, L
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 1980, 22 (04) : 341 - 347
  • [9] Characterization of the spermiation response, luteinizing hormone release and sperm quality in the American toad (Bufo americanus) and the endangered Wyoming toad (Bufo baxteri)
    Obringer, AR
    O'Brien, JK
    Saunders, RL
    Yamamoto, K
    Kikuyama, S
    Roth, TL
    [J]. REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 12 (1-2) : 51 - 58
  • [10] Ovulation induction with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) in mares
    Ataman, MB
    Günay, A
    Uzman, M
    Günay, Ü
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2000, 70 (08): : 810 - 812