Epidural tramadol for postoperative pain after Cesarean section

被引:29
|
作者
Siddik-Sayyid, S [1 ]
Aouad-Maroun, M [1 ]
Sleiman, D [1 ]
Sfeir, M [1 ]
Baraka, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Anesthesiol, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03013907
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the post-operative analgesic effect of 100 mg vs 200 mg epidural tramadol and saline in patients undergoing elective Cesarean section. Methods: Sixty healthy women undergoing Cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups (n = 20 in each). Patients received, at skin closure via the epidural catheter, 100 mg tramadol (Group 1), 200 mg tramadol (Group II) or 10 ml saline (Control group). Pain scores and side effects were evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hr after surgery. Mean times to the first analgesic administration, as well as the cumulative doses of analgesic requirements over 24 hr postoperatively were compared. Results: The mean time to first analgesic administration was longer in patients who received 100 mg tramadol (4.5 +/- 3.1 hr) and the 200 mg tramadol (6.6 +/- 3.4 hr) than in those who received placebo (2.8 +/- 2 hr). The mean cumulative doses of meperidine over 24 hr were less in the 100 mg tramadol group (0.3 +/- 0.3 mg.kg(-1)) and the 200 mg tramadol group (0.3 +/- 0.3 mg.kg(-1)) than In the control group (0.7 +/- 0.4 mg.kg(-1)). Also, the mean doses of diclofenac over 24 hr were less in the 100 mg tramadol group (156 +/- 59 mg) and the 200 mg tramadol group (142 +/- 62 mg) than in the control group (214 +/- 70 mg), However, no difference was obtained between patients receiving 100 mg and 200 mg tramadol concerning all parameters studied. Conclusion: Epidural tramadol 100 mg can provide adequate postoperative analgesia without respiratory depression in patients after Cesarean delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 735
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Epidural tramadol for postoperative pain after Cesarean section
    Sahar Siddik-Sayyid
    Marie Aouad-Maroun
    Danielle Sleiman
    Maria Sfeir
    Anis Baraka
    [J]. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 1999, 46 : 731 - 735
  • [2] EPIDURAL MORPHINE FOR THE RELIEF OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION
    HUGHES, SC
    ROSEN, MA
    SHNIDER, SM
    NORTON, M
    CURTIS, JD
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1982, 61 (02): : 190 - 191
  • [3] EPIDURAL BUTORPHANOL FOR THE RELIEF OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION
    ABBOUD, TK
    MOORE, M
    ZHU, J
    MURAKAWA, K
    MINEHART, M
    LONGHITANO, M
    TERRASI, J
    KLEPPER, ID
    CHOI, Y
    KIMBAL, S
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1986, 65 (3A) : A397 - A397
  • [4] Efficacy and Safety of Epidural tramadol versus morphine for postoperative pain after Cesarean section in China: a meta-analysis
    Xu, Sang
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2015, 35 (11): : E201 - E202
  • [5] Comparison of incisional and epidural analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain after cesarean section
    Meixnerova, I
    Huser, M.
    Seidlova, D.
    Janku, P.
    Stourac, P.
    Gal, R.
    [J]. CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 83 (03): : 182 - 187
  • [6] Postoperative pain after cesarean section
    Bjornstad, Jenny
    Raeder, Johan
    [J]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2020, 140 (07) : 669 - 671
  • [7] EPIDURAL TRAMADOL FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF
    DELILKAN, AE
    VIJAYAN, R
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 48 (04) : 328 - 331
  • [8] EPIDURAL SUFENTANIL FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION
    ROSEN, MA
    DAILEY, PA
    HUGHES, SC
    LEICHT, CH
    SHNIDER, SM
    JACKSON, CE
    BAKER, BW
    CHEEK, DB
    OCONNOR, DE
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1988, 68 (03) : 448 - 454
  • [9] EPIDURAL MORPHINE FOR THE RELIEF OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AFTER CESAREAN DELIVERY
    ROSEN, MA
    HUGHES, SC
    SHNIDER, SM
    ABBOUD, TK
    NORTON, M
    DAILEY, PA
    CURTIS, JD
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1983, 62 (07): : 666 - 672
  • [10] EPIDURAL MORPHINE FOR THE CONTROL OF PAIN AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION
    DONCHIN, Y
    DAVIDSON, JT
    MAGORA, F
    [J]. ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1981, 17 (05): : 331 - 334