Clinical microbiology study of diabetic foot ulcer in Iran; pathogens and antibacterial susceptibility

被引:9
|
作者
Rouhipour, Nahid [1 ]
Hayatshahi, Alireza [2 ]
Nikoo, Mohsen Khoshniat [1 ]
Yazdi, Nika Mojahed [1 ]
Heshmat, Ramin [1 ]
Qorbani, Mostafa [3 ]
Mehrannia, Masoud [4 ]
Shojaifard, Abolfazl [5 ]
Abbasi, Farzaneh [1 ]
Tavangar, Seyed Mohammad [6 ]
Tehrani, Mohammad Reza Mohajeri [1 ]
Larijani, Bagher [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Endocrinol Endocrinol & Metab Res Ctr EMRC, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Pharm, Shariati Hosp, Dept Pharmacotherapy, Tehran, Iran
[3] Fac Golestan Univ Med Sci, Kerman, Iran
[4] Iran Univ Med Sci, Div Publ Hlth, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Shariati Hosp, Div Surg, Tehran, Iran
[6] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Shariati Hosp, Div Pathol, Tehran, Iran
来源
关键词
Diabetic foot ulcer; Enterococcus; Staphylococcus; INFECTIONS;
D O I
10.5897/AJMR11.1464
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate microbial pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility profile in infected diabetic foot ulcers in Iranian patients. This was a one-year cross sectional study on diabetic patients with infected diabetic foot ulcer at Shariati Teaching Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Grade of ulcer was determined by Wagner's criteria. Specimens were obtained from the base of ulcer, deep part of the wound or aspiration and were tested with gram staining and antibacterial susceptibility was determined with both disk diffusion and E-Test methods. Total of 546 pathogens were isolated from 165 ulcers of 149 patients. Gram positive aerobes including Enterococcal species and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) (21.4 and 19.4%, respectively) were identified as the most common pathogens followed by Gram negative isolates including Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas-aeruginosa (12.6 and 5.4%, respectively). The majority of wounds were classified as Wagner grades 2 and 3 (15.7 and 75.7%). Appropriate empiric treatment to cover both these Gram positive and Gram negative pathogens is crucially important.
引用
收藏
页码:5601 / 5608
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in diabetic foot ulcer: A pilot study
    Sekhar, S. M.
    Vyas, N.
    Unnikrishnan, M. K.
    Rodrigues, G. S.
    Mukhopadhyay, C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH, 2014, 4 (05) : 742 - 745
  • [2] CLINICAL STUDY TO EVALUATE DIABETIC ULCER SEVERITY SCORE (DUSS) IN DIABETIC FOOT ULCER
    Harindranath, H. R.
    Jayaraj, Ravikar
    Kumar, Mohan R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (103): : 16827 - 16829
  • [3] The care process of diabetic foot ulcer patients: a qualitative study in Iran
    Mansooreh Aliasgharpour
    Nahid Dehghan Nayeri
    [J]. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 11 (1):
  • [4] The care process of diabetic foot ulcer patients: a qualitative study in Iran
    Aliasgharpour, Mansooreh
    Nayeri, Nahid Dehghan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2012, 11
  • [5] Economic burden of diabetic foot ulcer: a case of Iran
    Hashempour, Reza
    Mirhashemi, Seyedhadi
    Mollajafari, Fariba
    Damiri, Soheila
    Arabahmadi, Ali
    Raei, Behzad
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [6] Economic burden of diabetic foot ulcer: a case of Iran
    Reza Hashempour
    SeyedHadi MirHashemi
    Fariba Mollajafari
    Soheila Damiri
    Ali ArabAhmadi
    Behzad Raei
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 24
  • [7] The distribution and antibiotic resistance of common pathogens in diabetic foot ulcer
    Han, Xue
    Liu, Wenchi
    Chen, Qing
    Li, Qiu
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2015, 31 : 71 - 71
  • [9] Prediction of diabetic foot ulcer using readily available clinical information: The Seattle Diabetic Foot Study
    Boyko, EJ
    Ahroni, JH
    Stensel, V
    Forsberg, RC
    Heagerty, PJ
    [J]. DIABETES, 2002, 51 : A18 - A18
  • [10] Bacteriologic Study of Diabetic Foot Ulcer
    Alavi, S. M.
    Khosravi, A. Z.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 12 : E209 - E209