The evaluation of information technology projects: A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making approach

被引:41
|
作者
Thomaidis, NS
Nikitakos, N
Dounias, CD
机构
[1] Univ Aegean, Sch Business Studies, Dept Finance Engn & Management, Decis & Management Engn Lab, GR-82100 Chios, Greece
[2] Univ Aegean, Sch Business Studies, Dept Shipping Trade & Transport, GR-82100 Chios, Greece
关键词
information technology projects; multi-criteria decision analysis; fuzzy sets;
D O I
10.1142/S0219622006001897
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper presents a fuzzy set-based approach to the evaluation of information technology (IT) projects. We assume a multi-criteria decision-making framework, where sets of general and domain-specific criteria are used to judge the relative performance of alternative technologies. The methodology was originally developed for DJAS.net, an EU project aiming at the development of the Information Society in insular and isolated regions of Europe. In this paper, we present many aspects of our evaluation framework, including the synthesis of evaluation teams, the assessment of the importance of criteria, the evaluation of the performance of the alternatives and the final ranking and selection of projects. The methodology presented has the innovative feature of embodying techniques of fuzzy sets theory into the classical multi-criteria decision analysis. This combination enables us to handle efficiently the subjectiveness that often characterizes expert judgements on a decision problem. Fuzzy linguistic terms, such as "poor," "fair,",'very important," etc. are proposed for assessing the relative merit of alternatives and criteria. The paper concludes by exploring the potentiality of the above methodology in providing a flexible and robust IT evaluation framework.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 122
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Process of decision-making and evaluation of investment projects in information technology
    Bejjar, Mohamed Ali
    Boujelben, Younes
    [J]. INNOVATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: A GLOBAL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE, VOLS 1-4, 2011, : 512 - +
  • [2] A FUZZY MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH FOR ROBOT SELECTION
    LIANG, GS
    WANG, MJJ
    [J]. ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 1993, 10 (04) : 267 - 274
  • [3] A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach to Crime Linkage
    Goala, Soumendra
    Dutta, Palash
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND SYSTEMS APPROACH, 2018, 11 (02) : 31 - 50
  • [4] Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Model for Maintenance Management of Irrigation Projects
    Al-Khafaji, Mahmoud Saleh
    Mesheb, Khalid Shemal
    Abrahim, Mays Abdul Jabbar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2019, 145 (12)
  • [5] Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Model Based on Z Numbers for the Evaluation of Information Technology for Order Picking in Warehouses
    Stevic, Zeljko
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Tawfiq, Ferdous M. O.
    Tchier, Fairouz
    Davidov, Tatjana
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (24):
  • [6] A Novel Multicriteria Group Decision-Making Approach with Hesitant Picture Fuzzy Linguistic Information
    Yang, Lin
    Wu, Xiao-hui
    Qian, Jie
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [7] FUZZY INTEGRAL IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    GRABISCH, M
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1995, 69 (03) : 279 - 298
  • [8] A FUZZY METHOD FOR MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    TURUNEN, I
    JARVELAINEN, M
    DOHNAL, M
    [J]. ACTA POLYTECHNICA SCANDINAVICA-CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY SERIES, 1984, (154): : 1 - 28
  • [9] Information Aggregation of Hesitant Fuzzy Interval Sets for Multicriteria Decision-Making
    Liang, Decui
    Liu, Dun
    Quan, Wei
    [J]. COMPUTING IN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2018, 20 (02) : 38 - 51
  • [10] A multihesitant fuzzy linguistic multicriteria decision-making approach for logistics outsourcing with incomplete weight information
    Wang, Jing
    Wang, Jian-qiang
    Tian, Zhang-peng
    Zhao, Dong-yan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (03) : 831 - 856