Benefit-cost analysis of water quality policy and criteria in the Delaware River

被引:0
|
作者
Kauffman, Gerald J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Water Resources Ctr, Biden Sch Publ Policy & Adm, Newark, DE 19716 USA
关键词
Benefit-cost analysis; Economics; River basin; Water quality; OUTDOOR RECREATION; CLEAN-WATER; MANAGEMENT; STURGEON; DEMAND;
D O I
10.2166/wp.2020.017
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
This research conducts a benefit-cost analysis of water policies to reach an optimal level of dissolved oxygen (DO) to meet year-round fishable water quality criteria in the Delaware River. A watershed pollutant load model is utilized to estimate marginal cost curves of water quality improvements to meet a more protective year-round fishable standard and annual benefits are defined to achieve future DO criteria in the Delaware River. The most cost-effective DO standard is 4.5 mg/L defined by the point where the marginal benefits of willingness to pay (WTP) for improved water quality equals the marginal costs of pollution reduction. This optimal criteria (4.5 mg/L) can be achieved at a cost of $150 million with benefits ranging from $250 to $700 million/year. While a future DO standard of 4.5 mg/L reflects an economically efficient level of water quality, this DO criteria is less protective than the level of 5-6 mg/L needed to protect anadromous fish such as the Atlantic sturgeon. The policy to reach a DO level of 6 mg/L (at 80% DO saturation) may be difficult to achieve at summer water temperatures that approach 30 degrees C in the Delaware River at Philadelphia.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 327
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Water quality indices and benefit-cost analysis
    Walsh, Patrick J.
    Wheeler, William J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2013, 4 (01): : 81 - 105
  • [2] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS OF RUBELLA VACCINATION POLICY
    SCHOENBAUM, SC
    HYDE, JN
    BARTOSHESKY, L
    CRAMPTON, K
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1976, 294 (06): : 306 - 310
  • [3] Bureaucratic Benefit-Cost Analysis and Policy Controversy
    Scott, Ryan P.
    Scott, Tyler A.
    Zerbe, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2016, 7 (02) : 350 - 371
  • [4] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS OF RUBELLA VACCINATION POLICY
    SCHOENBAUM, SC
    HYDE, JN
    BARTOSHESKY, L
    CRAMPTON, K
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1975, 23 (03): : A267 - A267
  • [5] BENEFIT-COST AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 1973 - DIVERS,A
    CAZES, B
    [J]. REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE, 1976, 86 (05): : 819 - 821
  • [6] Once there was a river: a benefit-cost analysis of rehabilitation of the Jordan River
    Becker, Nir
    Helgeson, Jennifer
    Katz, David
    [J]. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2014, 14 (04) : 1303 - 1314
  • [7] Benefit-cost analysis of stormwater quality improvements
    Kalman, O
    Lund, JR
    Lew, DK
    Larson, DM
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (06) : 615 - 628
  • [8] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS OF LOCAL WATER SUPPLY
    STOBER, WJ
    FALK, LH
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 1967, 43 (03) : 328 - 335
  • [9] BUDGETARY CONSTRAINTS AND BENEFIT-COST CRITERIA
    VISCUSI, WK
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1972, 8 (05) : 1338 - &
  • [10] BENEFIT-COST AND POLICY ANALYSIS 1974 - ZECKHAUSER,R
    PFISTER, RL
    [J]. BUSINESS HORIZONS, 1976, 19 (04) : 96 - 96