Sustainability assessment of straw direct combustion power generation in China: From the environmental and economic perspectives of straw substitute to coal

被引:40
|
作者
Wang, Zhanwu [1 ]
Wang, Zhenfeng [1 ]
Xu, Guangyin [1 ]
Ren, Jingzheng [2 ]
Wang, Heng [1 ]
Li, Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Henan Agr Univ, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Direct combustion straw power generation; Sustainability; Life cycle assessment; Best-worst method; Straw supply chain; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; BIOFUEL SUPPLY CHAINS; BIOMASS PELLETS; BRIQUETTE FUEL; AGRICULTURAL RESIDUES; ENERGY-PRODUCTION; WOODY BIOMASS; WORST METHOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122890
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Straw power generation (SPG) can not only reduce dependence on coal, but also can convert agricultural waste into energy and alleviate environmental pollution. In order to address the major challenges such as sustainability of the SPG and to provide scientific ground from environmental and economic perspectives, a sustainability assessment model was established to evaluate the performance of SPG. Life cycle assessment (LCA), life-cycle cost (LCC) and the best-worst method (BWM) were integrated in the model. Four SPG scenarios were studied. The results showed that straw alternative coal-fired power generation had weak economic sustainability, the ratio of benefit to cost of SPG was 0.8752-1.1866. While, for the environmental dimension, a strong sustainability was obtained, the greenhouse gas (GHG) abatement potential of -0.8903 t CO2-eq t(-1) straw. The findings obtained from the four SPG scenarios suggested that direct combustion SPG had great sustainability potential in China, and several factors such as straw supply chain model, pollutant treatment technology, transport vehicles and straw purchase cost were the main factors which lead to unfavorable economic performance. We suggest that the SPG schemes, transport models and financial subsidies should be carefully designed to improve the sustainability of straw power generation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy and Environmental Assessment of Straw Production for Power Generation
    Bazaluk, Oleg
    Havrysh, Valerii
    Nitsenko, Vitalii
    [J]. 2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLIMATE CHANGE, GREEN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY (CCGEES 2020), 2021, 228
  • [2] Techno-economic assessment of triticale straw for power generation
    Dassanayake, Geekiyanage Disela Malinga
    Kumar, Amit
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 98 : 236 - 245
  • [3] Energy and environmental impact assessment of straw return and substitution of straw briquettes for heating coal in rural China
    Zhang, Shuangqi
    Deng, Mengsi
    Shan, Ming
    Zhou, Chuang
    Liu, Wei
    Xu, Xiaoqiu
    Yang, Xudong
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 128 : 654 - 664
  • [4] Assessment of the Environmental and Economic Performance of Heat Generation from Orange Peels and Sugarcane Straw
    Navarro-Pineda, Freddy S.
    Equihua-Sanchez, Mintzirani
    Grande-Acosta, Genice K.
    Sacramento Rivero, Julio C.
    Islas-Samperio, Jorge M.
    Bonales Revuelta, Joel
    Musule, Ricardo
    Garcia, Carlos A.
    Manzini, Fabio
    [J]. BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (04) : 1747 - 1763
  • [5] Assessment of the Environmental and Economic Performance of Heat Generation from Orange Peels and Sugarcane Straw
    Freddy S. Navarro-Pineda
    Mintzirani Equihua-Sánchez
    Genice K. Grande-Acosta
    Julio C. Sacramento Rivero
    Jorge M. Islas-Samperio
    Joel Bonales Revuelta
    Ricardo Musule
    Carlos A. García
    Fabio Manzini
    [J]. BioEnergy Research, 2022, 15 : 1747 - 1763
  • [6] Economic analysis of fuel collection, storage, and transportation in straw power generation in China
    Sun, Yufeng
    Cai, Wenchao
    Chen, Bo
    Guo, Xueying
    Hu, Jianjun
    Jiao, Youzhou
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 132 : 194 - 203
  • [7] Comparative Assessment of the Environmental and Economic Performance of Two Straw Utilization Pathways in China
    Li, Tong
    Wei, Guoxia
    Liu, Hanqiao
    Zhu, Yuwen
    Lin, Yanfei
    Han, Qianlong
    [J]. BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [8] Life cycle assessment and economic analysis of straw biogasification power generation technology
    Ma, Guojie
    Zhu, Linying
    Zhang, Miaomiao
    Zhao, Xiaoling
    Chang, Chun
    [J]. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38 (24): : 162 - 168
  • [9] Characteristics of trace elements and potential environmental risks of the ash from agricultural straw direct combustion biomass power plant
    Xu, Shihai
    Zhou, Chuncai
    Fang, Hongxia
    Zhu, Wenrui
    Shi, Jiaqian
    Liu, Guijian
    [J]. Chemosphere, 2023, 333
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of rice straw co-firing with coal power generation in Malaysia
    Shafie, S. M.
    Mahlia, T. M. I.
    Masjuki, H. H.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2013, 57 : 284 - 294