Compositional dynamics of multilevel innovation platforms in agricultural research for development

被引:40
|
作者
Lamers, Dieuwke [1 ]
Schut, Marc [2 ,3 ]
Klerkx, Laurens [3 ]
van Asten, Piet [4 ]
机构
[1] Int Inst Trop Agr, Bujumbura, Burundi
[2] Int Inst Trop Agr, Kigali, Rwanda
[3] Wageningen Univ, Knowledge Technol & Innovat Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Int Inst Trop Agr, Kampala, Uganda
关键词
inclusive innovation; functions of innovation systems; systemic instruments; transdisciplinary science; scales; multilevel action; RAAIS RAPID APPRAISAL; INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE; INTEGRATED ANALYSIS; DAIRY DEVELOPMENT; SCALE DYNAMICS; VALUE CHAINS; SYSTEMS; POLICY; PARTICIPATION; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scx009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Innovation platforms (IPs) form a popular vehicle in agricultural research for development (AR4D) to facilitate stakeholder interaction, agenda setting, and collective action toward sustainable agricultural development. In this article, we analyze multilevel stakeholder engagement in fulfilling seven key innovation system functions. Data are gathered from experiences with interlinked community and (sub) national IPs established under a global AR4D program aimed at stimulating sustainable agricultural development in Central Africa. Our findings show that all innovation systems functions required multilevel action, but that fulfillment of specific functions demands for strategic involvement of specific stakeholders at specific levels. We observed that a research-and dissemination-oriented sequence in the functions was prioritized in AR4D IPs and argue that such a sequence may be different in other types of (business) IPs. Our findings provide an incentive to think function oriented about compositional dynamics (stakeholder groups * levels) in innovation processes, rather than striving for equal stakeholder participation.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 752
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INNOVATION PLATFORMS: EXPERIENCES WITH THEIR INSTITUTIONAL EMBEDDING IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT
    Schut, Marc
    Klerkx, Laurens
    Sartas, Murat
    Lamers, Dieuwke
    Mc Campbell, Mariette
    Ogbonna, Ifeyinwa
    Kaushik, Pawandeep
    Atta-Krah, Kwesi
    Leeuwis, Cees
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2016, 52 (04) : 537 - 561
  • [2] A paradigm shift in African agricultural research for development: the role of innovation platforms
    Sanyang, Sidi
    Taonda, Sibiri Jean-Baptiste
    Kuiseu, Julienne
    Coulibaly, N'Tji
    Konate, Laban
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 14 (02) : 187 - 213
  • [3] INNOVATION PLATFORMS IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT Ex-ante Appraisal of the Purposes and Conditions Under Which Innovation Platforms can Contribute to Agricultural Development Outcomes
    Schut, Marc
    Kamanda, Josey
    Gramzow, Andreas
    Dubois, Thomas
    Stoian, Dietmar
    Andersson, Jens A.
    Dror, Iddo
    Sartas, Murat
    Mur, Remco
    Kassam, Shinan
    Brouwer, Herman
    Devaux, Andre
    Velasco, Claudio
    Flor, Rica Joy
    Gummert, Martin
    Buizer, Djuna
    McDougall, Cynthia
    Davis, Kristin
    Tui, Sabine Homann-Kee
    Lundy, Mark
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2019, 55 (04) : 575 - 596
  • [4] Multiactor Management Platforms to Boost Local Development and Agricultural Innovation
    von Oppeln, Constanze
    [J]. ESTUDIOS DEL DESARROLLO SOCIAL-CUBA Y AMERICA LATINA, 2018, 6 (02): : 150 - 167
  • [5] Multilevel innovation platforms for development of smallholder livestock systems: How effective are they?
    Lema, Zelalem
    de Bruyn, Lisa A. Lobry
    Marshall, Graham R.
    Roschinsky, Romana
    Duncan, Alan J.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 189
  • [6] Do multilevel agricultural innovation platforms support inclusive innovation? Lessons learned from a case study in the Ethiopian highlands
    Lema, Zelalem
    de Bruyn, Lisa A. Lobry
    Marshall, Graham R.
    Roschinsky, Romana
    Duncan, Alan J.
    [J]. INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2024,
  • [7] DO MATURE INNOVATION PLATFORMS MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT? A META-ANALYSIS OF CASE STUDIES
    Schut, Marc
    Cadilhon, Jean-Joseph
    Misiko, Michael
    Dror, Iddo
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2018, 54 (01) : 96 - 119
  • [8] Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: Opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling
    Hermans, Frans
    Sartas, Murat
    Van Schagen, Boudy
    van Asten, Piet
    Schut, Marc
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [9] Farmer First Revisited: Innovation for Agricultural Research and Development
    McWilliam, Peter
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2011, 21 (03) : 452 - 453
  • [10] Networking research, development and innovation in agricultural engineering through IAEJ
    Li, Shujun
    Wang, Yingkuan
    [J]. International Agricultural Engineering Journal, 2010, 19 (02):