Project Universal Preschool Vision Screening: A demonstration project

被引:23
|
作者
Hartmann, EE
Bradford, GE
Chaplin, PKN
Johnson, T
Kemper, AR
Kim, S
Marsh-Tootle, W
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Optometry, Sch Optometry, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] W Virginia Univ, Inst Eye, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Div Gen Pediat, Child Hlth Evaluat & Res Unit, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Amer Acad Pediat, Elk Grove Village, IL USA
关键词
vision screening; vision; amblyopia; preschool; well-child;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2004-2809
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES. Visual disorders among preschool-aged children are common, yet screening is infrequent. The purpose of this project was to implement the vision screening recommendations proposed by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau and National Eye Institute Vision Screening in the Preschool Child Task Force: monocular visual acuity and stereopsis testing. METHODS. Four sites fully participated in the implementation of the task force recommendations with 3- and 4-year-old children. Two of the sites worked with primary care practices (testing performed by staff); 2 worked with community-based programs (testing performed by lay volunteers). Each site tracked number of children screened by age, as well as proportion testable, referred, and with documented follow-up evaluation. RESULTS. Variations in implementation of the recommendations were observed. Successful screening among 3-year-olds ranged from 70% to 93%; referral rates were 1% to 41%, and follow-up rates were 29% to 100%. Successful screening among 4-year-olds ranged from 88% to 98%; referral rates were 2% to 40%, and follow-up rates were 41% to 100%. The proportion of 3-year-olds who were treated was significantly different between the community-based sites (n=20) and the primary care sites (n=2). Similarly, the proportion of 4-year-olds who were treated was significantly different between the community-based sites (n=36) and the primary care sites (n=11). CONCLUSIONS. The variability across pilot sites in numbers successfully screened and numbers referred suggests that all aspects of preschool vision screening need thorough review before the goal of universal preschool vision screening can be realized.
引用
收藏
页码:E226 / E237
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PRESCHOOL VISION SCREENING DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
    GIBBONS, H
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 1970, 40 (02) : 76 - 77
  • [2] Project universal preschool vision screening (PUPVS): Implementation of a standardized vision screening protocol in primary care and early care and education settings
    Hartmann, EE
    Bradford, G
    Marsh-Tootle, WL
    Johnson, T
    Kemper, A
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U328 - U328
  • [3] Baltimore vision screening project
    Preslan, MW
    Novak, A
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 103 (01) : 105 - 109
  • [4] The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: Introduction and overview
    Prieve, BA
    Stevens, F
    EAR AND HEARING, 2000, 21 (02): : 85 - 91
  • [6] Vision Screening in Preschool Children Do the Data Support Universal Screening?
    Lagreze, Wolf A.
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 107 (28-29): : 495 - 499
  • [7] New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: Inpatient outcome measures
    Spivak, L
    Dalzell, L
    Berg, A
    Bradley, M
    Cacace, A
    Campbell, D
    DeCristofaro, J
    Gravel, J
    Greenberg, E
    Gross, S
    Orlando, M
    Pinheiro, J
    Regan, J
    Stevens, F
    Prieve, B
    EAR AND HEARING, 2000, 21 (02): : 92 - 103
  • [8] The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: Outpatient outcome measures
    Prieve, B
    Dalzell, L
    Berg, A
    Bradley, M
    Cacace, A
    Campbell, D
    DeCristofaro, J
    Gravel, J
    Greenberg, E
    Gross, S
    Orlando, M
    Pinheiro, J
    Regan, J
    Spivak, L
    Stevens, F
    EAR AND HEARING, 2000, 21 (02): : 104 - 117
  • [9] Simplified medical abortion screening: a demonstration project
    Raymond, Elizabeth G.
    Tan, Yi-Ling
    Comendant, Rodica
    Sagaidac, Irina
    Hodorogea, Stelian
    Grant, Melissa
    Sanhueza, Patricio
    Van Pratt, Emigdio
    Gillespie, Ginger
    Boraas, Christy
    Weaver, Mark A.
    Platais, Ingrida
    Bousieguez, Manuel
    Winikoff, Beverly
    CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 97 (04) : 292 - 296
  • [10] A commentary on the medicare low vision rehabilitation demonstration project
    Mogk, Lylas
    Watson, Gale R.
    Williams, Michael
    JOURNAL OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT & BLINDNESS, 2008, 102 (02) : 69 - 75