Large-eddy simulation on the influence of injection pressure in reacting Spray A

被引:88
|
作者
Kahila, Heikki [1 ]
Wehrfritz, Armin [1 ]
Kaario, Ossi [1 ]
Masouleh, Mandi Ghaderi [1 ]
Maes, Noud [2 ]
Somers, Bart [2 ]
Vuorinen, Ville [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Puumiehenkuja 5, Espoo 02150, Finland
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Dolech 2, NL-5612 AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
LES; FGM; Spray A; Combustion; Ignition; Ignition kernels; LASER-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE; N-DODECANE; TURBULENT COMBUSTION; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; KINETIC SCHEMES; DIESEL; IGNITION; TEMPERATURE; MODEL; FLAME;
D O I
10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.01.004
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The Engine Combustion Network (ECN) Spray A target case corresponds to high-pressure liquid fuel injection in conditions relevant to diesel engines. Following the procedure by Wehrfritz et al. (2016), we utilize large-eddy simulation (LES) and flamelet generated manifold (FGM) methods to carry out an injection pressure sensitivity study for Spray A at 50, 100 and 150 MPa. Comparison with experiments is shown for both non-reacting and reacting conditions. Validation results in non-reacting conditions indicate relatively good agreement between the present LES and experimental data, with some deviation in mixture fraction radial profiles. In reacting conditions, the simulated flame lift-off length (FLOL) increases with injection pressure, deviating from the experiments by 4-14%. Respectively, the ignition delay time (IDT) decreases with increasing injection pressure and it is underpredicted in the simulations by 10-20%. Analysis of the underlying chemistry manifold implies that the observed discrepancies can be explained by the differences between experimental and computational mixing processes. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Combustion Institute. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 159
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Large-eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows
    Pitsch, Heinz
    Desjardins, Olivier
    Balarac, Guillaume
    Ihme, Matthias
    [J]. PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2008, 44 (06) : 466 - 478
  • [2] LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF A TURBULENT REACTING PLUME
    SYKES, RI
    HENN, DS
    PARKER, SF
    LEWELLEN, WS
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1992, 26 (14): : 2565 - 2574
  • [3] Large eddy simulation of high pressure spray with the focus on injection pressure
    Salehi, Fatemeh
    Ghiji, Mohammadmandi
    Chen, Longfei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 2020, 82 (82)
  • [4] Large-eddy simulation of a turbulent reacting liquid flow\
    Michioka, T
    Komori, S
    [J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 2004, 50 (11) : 2705 - 2720
  • [5] A LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION SCHEME FOR TURBULENT REACTING FLOWS
    GAO, F
    OBRIEN, EE
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS A-FLUID DYNAMICS, 1993, 5 (06): : 1282 - 1284
  • [6] Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) of Spray Transients: Start and End of Injection Phenomena
    Battistoni, Michele
    Xue, Qingluan
    Som, Sibendu
    [J]. OIL AND GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, 2016, 71 (01):
  • [7] Large-eddy simulation of supercritical fluid injection
    Petit, X.
    Ribert, G.
    Lartigue, G.
    Domingo, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS, 2013, 84 : 61 - 73
  • [8] Large-eddy simulation of reacting turbulent flows in complex geometries
    Mahesh, K.
    Constantinescu, G.
    Apte, S.
    Iaccarino, G.
    Ham, F.
    Moin, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2006, 73 (03): : 374 - 381
  • [9] Large-eddy simulation of the injection timing effects on the dual-fuel spray flame
    Xu, Shijie
    Zhong, Shenghui
    Hadadpour, Ahmad
    Zhang, Yan
    Pang, Kar Mun
    Jangi, Mehdi
    Fatehi, Hesameddin
    Bai, Xue-Song
    [J]. Fuel, 2022, 310
  • [10] LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF TRANS AND SUPERCRITICAL INJECTION
    Mueller, H.
    Niedermeier, C. A.
    Jarczyk, M.
    Pfitzner, M.
    Hickel, S.
    Adams, N. A.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PROPULSION PHYSICS - VOL 8, 2016, : 5 - 24