Application for Inpatient Psychosomatic Rehabilitation: Frequency, Quality, and Approval Rates

Background: There has been a steady increase in psychiatric primary diagnoses in medical rehabilitation services carried out by the statutory pension insurance (DRV). To date, no data are available regarding frequency, quality, and approval rates of applications for psychosomatic rehabilitation. Pension insurance physicians reviewing the application require sufficient information on rehabilitation-related needs, motivation, abilities, and prognosis of an insured person. Medical reports accompanying application for rehabilitation are often provided by a family physician. Psychiatric disorders are often misdiagnosed by general practitioners. Method: In a 2-week period, all decisions made by pension insurance physicians evaluating applications for rehabilitation were recorded. For each incoming application, the following data were documented: psychiatric and somatic primary diagnosis; availability of medical reports; information on prior treatment/therapy; request for further information; decision made by the physician. Results: 1,366 applications (with 81% first-time applications) were included in the analysis. 16.2% of all applications were from insurants with psychiatric primary diagnoses. 44.0% of these applications included a medical report from the family physician only. The proportion of rejected applications (34.7%) and undecided applications (27.2%) was higher in the group of applicants with psychiatric primary diagnosis vs. somatic primary diagnosis (19.6% rejected; 12.7% undecided; (2) =79.8(4), p=0.001). Applications from patients with psychiatric primary diagnosis that lacked a medical report from a psychiatrist/psychotherapist were more likely to be rejected (45.3 vs. 32.3%) or to remain undecided (28.0 vs. 18.3%; (2) =10.2(2), p=0.006). In contrast, among applicants with a history of psychiatric/psychotherapeutic treatment, there was a higher proportion of undecided applications accompanied by a medical report from the family physician (35.7 vs. 18.2%). Conclusion: It might be useful to have medical reports generally provided by medical specialists. This may help both to increase the informative value of applications for psychosomatic rehabilitation and enable quicker decisions and better diagnosis.