Mechanical failure of fresh nuclear grade iron-chromium-aluminum (FeCrAl) cladding under simulated hot zero power reactivity initiated accident conditions

被引:9
|
作者
Brown, Nicholas R. [1 ]
Garrison, Benton E. [2 ]
Lowden, Richard R. [2 ]
Cinbiz, M. Nedim [2 ]
Linton, Kory D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37913 USA
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA
关键词
CRITICAL HEAT-FLUX; BEHAVIOR; ZIRCALOY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152352
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The reactivity initiated accident (RIA) is a postulated accident in light water reactors initiated by a rapid increase in reactivity which causes an increase in fission rate and fuel temperature. One potential mode of fuel system failure during RIA is pellet cladding mechanical interaction (PCMI) due to the rapid thermal expansion of the fuel pellet. Simulated PCMI experiments were performed by rapidly pressurizing iron-chromium-aluminum (FeCrAl) cladding tube samples using a hydraulic modified burst test system, causing the specimens to burst under a biaxial loading path. Deformation and rupture of the specimens were tracked with a telecentric lens and high-speed camera system. Outer surface strains were calculated using digital image correlation (DIC) on speckle patterns painted on the specimens' outer surfaces. Experiments were conducted at approximately 275 degrees C, representative of hot zero power RIA conditions. The failure hoop strain was DIC-calculated between approximately 1.8-3.4%, corresponding to quasi-static energy depositions of approximately 110-260 calories per gram UO2 assuming initial pellet-cladding contact. These conditions are very similar to the proposed energy deposition limit of 150 calories per gram UO2 for unirradiated zirconium-based cladding in US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Draft Regulatory Guide 1327. A very small strain rate dependence was observed in the data, with the magnitude of the failure hoop strain decreasing slightly with increasing strain rate. This observed dependence may be relevant because the FeCrAl cladding strain rate will be approximately 20% higher than in zirconium-based cladding due to the harder neutron spectrum and resultant shorter neutron generation time. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] BISON validation of FeCrAl cladding mechanical failure during simulated reactivity-initiated accident conditions
    Lee, Soon K.
    Garrison, Ben E.
    Capps, Nathan A.
    Pastore, Giovanni
    Massey, Caleb P.
    Linton, Kory D.
    Brown, Nicholas R.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 2022, 564
  • [2] Influence of cladding-peripheral hydride on mechanical fuel failure under reactivity-initiated accident conditions
    Tomiyasu, Kunihiko
    Sugiyama, Tornoyuki
    Fuketa, Toyoshi
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 44 (05) : 733 - 742
  • [3] Iron-Chromium-Aluminum (FeCrAl) Cladding Oxidation Kinetics and Auxiliary Feedwater Sensitivity Analysis-Short-Term Station Blackout Simulation of Surry Nuclear Power Plant
    Wang, Jun
    Mccabe, McKinleigh
    Haskin, Troy Christopher
    Wu, Yingwei
    Su, Guanghui
    Corradini, Michael L.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND RADIATION SCIENCE, 2018, 4 (04):
  • [4] Thresholds for failure of high-burnup LWR fuels by Pellet Cladding mechanical interaction under reactivity-initiated accident conditions
    Udagawa, Yutaka
    Sugiyama, Tomoyuki
    Amaya, Masaki
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 56 (12) : 1063 - 1072
  • [5] A study on the fracture pattern change of high-burnup fuel cladding failed by pellet-cladding mechanical interaction failure under reactivity-initiated accident conditions
    Li, Feng
    Mihara, Takeshi
    Udagawa, Yutaka
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 61 (09) : 1265 - 1275
  • [6] Mechanical failure of high-burnup fuel rods with stress-relieved annealed and recrystallized M-MDA cladding under reactivity-initiated accident conditions
    Mihara, Takeshi
    Udagawa, Yutaka
    Sugiyama, Tomoyuki
    Amaya, Masaki
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 58 (08) : 872 - 885