Evaluation of the promising neighbourhoods community program to reduce health inequalities in youth: a protocol of a mixed-methods study

被引:8
|
作者
Boelens, Mirte [1 ]
Windhorst, Dafna A. [1 ]
Jonkman, Harrie [2 ]
Hosman, Clemens M. H. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Raat, Hein [1 ]
Jansen, Wilma [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Verwey Jonker Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Promot, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Clin Psychol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Hosman Prevent & Innovat Consultancy, Berg En Dal, Netherlands
关键词
Youth; Children; Evaluation; Health; Community-based; Collaboration; Stakeholder participation; Socioeconomic prevention; CARE PREVENTION SYSTEM; SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITIES; CHILDHOOD OVERWEIGHT; DOWNWARD TRENDS; IMPLEMENTATION; PREVALENCE; PROMOTION; INTERVENTIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-019-6901-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundReducing socioeconomic health inequalities among youth is a major challenge for governments around the world and reports on successful attempts are scarce. Socioecological and integral approaches with collaborative partnerships and community engagement are recommended but knowledge about the effectiveness and effective and ineffective elements is limited. The Promising Neighbourhoods program employs such an approach aiming to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in health, safety and talent development in youth. We will evaluate the process-implementation, and effectiveness of the Promising Neighbourhoods program.Methods/designCore elements of Promising Neighbourhoods are a collaborative community programming approach with stakeholders, data-based priority setting, knowledge-, and theory-based policies and evidence-based interventions. Community stakeholders and key-leaders from the neighbourhoods are engaged in the program. For this evaluation study the program will be implemented in three intervention neighbourhoods. These neighbourhoods will be compared to three control neighbourhoods at baseline in 2018/2019 and at follow-up in 2020/2021 after full implementation of the Promising Neighbourhoods program. Intervention neighbourhoods receive a tailored intervention-package including evidence-based interventions and additional measures by community stakeholders. In control neighbourhoods, no special planning will take place thus interventions are offered as usual. A mixed-methods approach following the stages of the logic model from program is applied for this evaluation. Questionnaires, focus groups, and registration data will be collected among community stakeholders, key-leaders, and youth to evaluate the process-implementation of the program. Indicators of intermediate and ultimate outcomes will be studied among N=818 children and N=818 youngsters using difference-in-difference regression analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the Promising Neighbourhoods program.DiscussionHypotheses are that a collaborative community approach with stakeholders leads to clear priority-setting and better tailored interventions of better quality. We further hypothesise a decline in socioeconomic inequalities in intermediate and ultimate outcomes for health, safety and talent development in the intervention neighbourhoods in comparison to control neighbourhoods. The results add knowledge about effective and ineffective elements of collaborative community programming approaches to reduce health inequalities in youth and thus are relevant for local and national public health authorities.Trial registrationNetherlands National Trial Register number NL7279. Date of registration: 26-Sept-2018.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the promising neighbourhoods community program to reduce health inequalities in youth: a protocol of a mixed-methods study
    Mirte Boelens
    Dafna A. Windhorst
    Harrie Jonkman
    Clemens M. H. Hosman
    Hein Raat
    Wilma Jansen
    BMC Public Health, 19
  • [2] Development and evaluation of the IPLAY program: A protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility study targeting newcomer youth
    Kwan, Matthew Y. W.
    Kandasamy, Sujane
    Graham, Jeffrey
    Konopaki, Jennifer
    Brown, Denver M. Y.
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (04):
  • [3] Effectiveness of a multiple-strategy community intervention to reduce maternal and child health inequalities in Haryana, North India: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Gupta, Madhu
    Angeli, Federica
    van Schayck, Onno C. P.
    Bosma, Hans
    GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2015, 8
  • [4] Community Health Workers as Mental Health Paraprofessionals:Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Pilot Feasibility Study
    Moyce, Sally
    Crawford, Cassidy
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [5] Development of a Health Literacy Program for Parents of Children with Cancer: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
    Bahrami, Masoud
    Eslami, Ahmad Ali
    Moafi, Alireza
    Sayahi, Somaye
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (12) : 1 - 6
  • [6] The Community-Based Child Health Integrated Program in Iran: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
    Barzegari, Maliheh
    Fathollahi, Pourya
    Afsharpour, Fatemeh
    Foroumandi, Elaheh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILD HEALTH AND NUTRITION, 2022, 11 (01): : 30 - 41
  • [7] Study protocol: a mixed-methods realist evaluation of the Universal Health Visiting Pathway in Scotland
    Doi, Lawrence
    Morrison, Kathleen
    Astbury, Ruth
    Eunson, Jane
    Horne, Margaret A.
    Jepson, Ruth
    Marryat, Louise
    Ormston, Rachel
    Wood, Rachael
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [8] Evaluation of ethical reflections in community healthcare: A mixed-methods study
    Soderhamn, Ulrika
    Kjostvedt, Helga Tofte
    Slettebo, Ashild
    NURSING ETHICS, 2015, 22 (02) : 194 - 204
  • [9] A mixed-methods evaluation of a community physical activity program for breast cancer survivors
    Catherine M. Sabiston
    Angela J. Fong
    Erin K. O’Loughlin
    Sarkis Meterissian
    Journal of Translational Medicine, 17
  • [10] A mixed-methods evaluation of a community physical activity program for breast cancer survivors
    Sabiston, Catherine M.
    Fong, Angela J.
    O'Loughlin, Erin K.
    Meterissian, Sarkis
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (1)