The role of spatial information in advance task-set control: an event-related potential study

被引:20
|
作者
Astle, D. E. [1 ]
Jackson, G. M. [2 ]
Swainson, R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Div Psychiat, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Psychol, Aberdeen, Scotland
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
cognitive control; ERP; task-switching;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06439.x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Task-switching has proved to be a fruitful paradigm for studying cognitive control mechanisms. Interestingly, this avenue of study has revealed that subjects are, to some degree, able to bring about a change in task-set prior to the performance of that task (provided that they are given advance warning of the upcoming task, for instance in the form of a cue). Event-related potentials (ERPs) have proved to be a good way of measuring these rapid anticipatory control processes. To explore these processes further, the current study examined the relationship between the availability of spatial information and cue-locked task-switching ERP effects. Two groups of subjects were compared: one group could separate the task-sets on the basis of the targets' colour (the 'colour' group), the second on the basis of the targets' location (the 'spatial' group). The performance of both groups benefited to the same extent from advance cueing of task-transitions (switches or repeats), yet the ERP data revealed cue-locked (but not target-locked) differences between the two groups. The most striking of these differences was the absence of both a late positivity over posterior scalp and a late negativity over frontal scalp when the spatial group switched between tasks. Thus, it seems unlikely that these effects index stimulus-response 'reconfiguration' per se-as the mappings were identical for both groups of subjects-but rather that these task-switching processes are sensitive to how the mappings are represented.
引用
收藏
页码:1404 / 1418
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Commonalities between mind wandering and task-set switching: An event-related potential study
    Wong, Yi-Sheng
    Pat, Narun
    Machado, Liana
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2023, 185
  • [2] Event-related brain potential measures of task set switching
    Phillips, N
    Poulsen, C
    Segalowitz, N
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 37 : S79 - S79
  • [3] Influence of aggression on information processing in the emotional Stroop task - an event-related potential study
    Bertsch, Katja
    Boehnke, Robina
    Kruk, Menno R.
    Naumann, Ewald
    FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 3
  • [4] Task reconfiguration and carryover in task switching: An event-related potential study
    Hsieh, Shulan
    Chen, Poyu
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1084 : 132 - 145
  • [5] The Effects of Foreknowledge and Task-Set Shifting as Mirrored in Cue- and Target-Locked Event-Related Potentials
    Finke, Mareike
    Escera, Carles
    Barcelo, Francisco
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11):
  • [6] Dissociating neural indices of dynamic cognitive control in advance task-set preparation: An ERP study of task switching
    Astle, D. E.
    Jackson, G. M.
    Swainson, R.
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1125 : 94 - 103
  • [7] Using visual advance information:: an event-related functional MRI study
    Klaver, P
    Fell, R
    Weis, S
    de Greiff, A
    Ruhlmann, J
    Reul, J
    Elger, CE
    Fernández, G
    COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 20 (02): : 242 - 255
  • [8] Reconfiguration of response-set in task switching: Event-related potential evidence
    Xie, Liufang
    Cao, Bihua
    Chen, Yun
    Wu, Jianxiao
    Li, Fuhong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 57 (05) : 796 - 808
  • [9] Cognitive control is modulated by hierarchical complexity of task switching: An event-related potential study
    Wu, Jianxiao
    Chen, Yun
    Li, Zixia
    Li, Fuhong
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 434
  • [10] An event-related potential study on the "check operation" in the Eriksen task
    Iwaki, N
    Miyatani, M
    Toshima, T
    JAPANESE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 47 (04) : 239 - 250