Species distribution modelling to support marine conservation planning: The next steps

被引:49
|
作者
Marshall, C. E. [1 ]
Glegg, G. A. [1 ]
Howell, K. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Plymouth, Inst Marine, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
关键词
Species distribution model; Marine ecosystem; Indicator species; Biological traits; Metadata; Model error; COLD-WATER CORALS; PROTECTED AREAS; LOPHELIA-PERTUSA; STONY CORALS; HABITAT; SEA; SEAMOUNTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2013.09.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Species distribution models (SDMs) offer great potential for inclusion into the toolbox of today's marine environmental manager, especially with regard to marine conservation and planning. The application of SDMs in the marine environment over recent years has been varied but there are still relatively few examples in comparison with terrestrial application, and this is especially true in deep-sea marine ecosystems. This short article builds upon two recent review articles concerning the application of species distribution modelling studies in the marine realm, offering additional practical considerations for discussion. Recommendations for progressing the improved application of SDMs to support marine conservation planning are given, including combining model outputs with other data layers, metadata standards and model error. SDMs have both an urgent and long term contribution to make to marine conservation planning globally, and it is hoped that this article, in combination with developing research on marine SDMs, will contribute to some much needed discussion and inform best practice and new research to enable these models to be of greater use to marine managers. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 332
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Species distribution modelling for conservation planning in Victoria of Australia
    Liu, C.
    White, M.
    Newell, G.
    Griffioen, P.
    [J]. 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2011), 2011, : 2247 - 2253
  • [2] Species distribution modelling for conservation planning in Victoria, Australia
    Liu, Canran
    White, Matt
    Newell, Graeme
    Griffioen, Peter
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2013, 249 : 68 - 74
  • [3] Next Steps for Conservation Agriculture
    Landers, John N.
    de Freitas, Pedro Luiz
    de Oliveira, Mauricio Carvalho
    da Silva Neto, Sebastiao Pedro
    Ralisch, Ricardo
    Kueneman, Eric Alan
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [4] Enterprise Modelling: The Next Steps
    Frank, Ulrich
    [J]. ENTERPRISE MODELLING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURES-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2014, 9 (01): : 22 - 37
  • [5] MODELLING ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY FOR MARINE SPECIES CONSERVATION: THE EFFECT OF VARIABLE CONNECTIVITY ON SPECIES SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND AGE-STRUCTURE
    Guizien, Katell
    Bramanti, Lorenzo
    [J]. THEORETICAL BIOLOGY FORUM, 2014, 107 (1-2): : 47 - 56
  • [6] The use of demographic sensitivity analysis in marine species conservation planning
    Gerber, LR
    Heppell, SS
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 120 (01) : 121 - 128
  • [7] Modelling dolphin distribution within an Important Marine Mammal Area in Greece to support spatial management planning
    Bonizzoni, Silvia
    Furey, Nathan B.
    Santostasi, Nina Luisa
    Eddy, Lavinia
    Valavanis, Vasilis D.
    Bearzi, Giovanni
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2019, 29 (10) : 1665 - 1680
  • [8] What are the roles of species distribution models in conservation planning?
    McShea, William J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 41 (02) : 93 - 96
  • [9] The application of predictive modelling of species distribution to biodiversity conservation
    Paul Rodriguez, Jon
    Brotons, Lluis
    Bustamante, Javier
    Seoane, Javier
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2007, 13 (03) : 243 - 251
  • [10] Community ecological modelling as an alternative to physiographic classifications for marine conservation planning
    Emily M Rubidge
    Katie S. P. Gale
    Janelle M. R. Curtis
    [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2016, 25 : 1899 - 1920