Comparative study of the oncologic results of the radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy (75.6 Gy) combined with concomitant hormonotherapy for prostate cancer at intermediate risk of D'Amico

被引:1
|
作者
Boissier, R. [1 ]
Karsenty, G. [1 ]
Muracciole, X. [2 ]
Daniel, L. [3 ]
Delaporte, V. [1 ]
Maurin, C. [1 ]
Coulange, C. [1 ]
Lechevallier, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, Hop Concept, Serv Urol & Transplantat Renale, F-13005 Marseille, France
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, Hop Timone, Serv Radiotherapie, F-13010 Marseille, France
[3] Aix Marseille Univ, Hop Timone, Serv Anatomopathol, F-13010 Marseille, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2013年 / 23卷 / 10期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Intermediate risk; Radical prostatectomy; External beam radiotherapy; Short hormonotherapy; ANDROGEN-DEPRIVATION THERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; FREE SURVIVAL; DOSE-ESCALATION; ANTIGEN; MORTALITY; CARCINOMA; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2013.04.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction. - Thirty-three percent of the localized cancers belongs initially to the group of intermediate risk of D'Amico. The standard treatments validated by the French Association of Urology are the radical prostatectomy and the external beam radiotherapy. Objectives. - We retrospectively compared the carcinologic results of the radical prostatectomy +/- adjuvant treatment (RP) and the external beam radiotherapy combining high dose (75.6 Gy) and short hormonotherapy (RH), in the treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer. The series consisted of 143 patients treated between 2000 and 2006 in the department of Urology and Kidney transplantation of the Conception Hospital, Marseilles. The main assessment criteria was the survival without biological recurrence (SBR). Results. - The median follow-up was 90 months [59-51]. The 5 years and 8 years SBR were 85% and 73% in the RH group, versus 74% and 65% with RP (P = 0.196). There was a significant difference between the series: on the age of diagnosis (63.9 versus 73.3 years, P < 0.001), the Charlson score of comorbidity (2 versus 3, P < 0.001) and the number of intermediate criteria per patients (one intermediate criteria: RP 74% versus 57%, P < 0.01). Conclusion. - According to our study, there was no superiority of the radical prostatectomy +/- adjuvant treatment or the external radiotherapy combining high dose and concomitant short hormonotherapy on the survival without biological recurrence at 5 and 8 years. Many studies confirm that a concomitant hormonotherapy increases the carcinologic control, even with a high rate external beam radiotherapy. (c) 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 868
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy for high risk prostate cancer: comparison of treatment outcomes
    Demeshko, P. D.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2015, 11 (02): : 61 - 68
  • [2] Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy &gt;72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy ≤72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer
    Kupelian, PA
    Potters, L
    Khuntia, D
    Ciezki, JP
    Reddy, CA
    Reuther, AM
    Carlson, TP
    Klein, EA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (01): : 25 - 33
  • [3] Comparing prognosis of external beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate cancer
    Tang, Cai
    Li, Ao
    Wei, Xin
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 47 (04) : 1781 - 1782
  • [4] Comparison of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer
    Chun, Seok-Joo
    Kim, Jin Ho
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kwak, Cheol
    Lee, Eun Sik
    Kim, Suzy
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 39 (03): : 231 - 238
  • [5] Comparative oncologic analysis of open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy matched by D'Amico risk category
    Sooriakumaran, P.
    Shariat, S. F.
    Srivastava, A.
    Grover, S.
    Chromecki, T.
    Tewari, A. K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 : 35 - 35
  • [6] Survival Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiotherapy in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A NCDB Study
    Marsh, Sydney
    Walters, Ryan W.
    Silberstein, Peter T.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2018, 16 (01) : E39 - E46
  • [7] Radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer Comparison of treatment outcomes
    Kim, Yeon-Joo
    Cho, Kwan Ho
    Pyo, Hong Ryull
    Lee, Kang Hyun
    Moon, Sung Ho
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    Shin, Kyung Hwan
    Kim, Joo-Young
    Kim, Young-kyung
    Lee, Se Byeong
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2015, 191 (04) : 321 - 329
  • [8] REASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS FOR BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE IN D'AMICO INTERMEDIATE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER TREATED BY RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Narita, Shintaro
    Mitsuzuka, Koji
    Tsuchiya, Norihiko
    Koie, Takuya
    Kawamura, Sadafumi
    Ohyama, Chikara
    Tochigi, Tatsuo
    Yamaguchi, Takuhiro
    Arai, Yoichi
    Habuchi, Tomonori
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E712 - E713
  • [9] Comparison on efficacy of radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Chen, Linyan
    Li, Qingfang
    Wang, Yexiao
    Zhang, Yiwen
    Ma, Xuelei
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (45) : 79854 - 79863
  • [10] Definitive external-beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy in clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer: a retrospective study
    Andic, Fundagul
    Izol, Volkan
    Gokcay, Serkan
    Arslantas, Hasan Suat
    Bayazit, Yildirim
    Coskun, Hatice
    Tansug, Mustafa Zuhtu
    Sertdemir, Yasar
    BMC UROLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)