Personality characteristics and state mood influence individual deck selections on the Iowa Gambling Task

被引:60
|
作者
Buelow, Melissa T. [1 ]
Suhr, Julie A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Newark, OH 43055 USA
[2] Ohio Univ, Dept Psychol, Athens, OH 45701 USA
关键词
Iowa Gambling Task; IGT; State mood; Personality; BIS/BAS; PANAS; Impulsivity; DECISION-MAKING; FUTURE CONSEQUENCES; RISK-TAKING; IMPULSIVITY; INSENSITIVITY; ADOLESCENTS; PERFORMANCE; INHIBITION; PUNISHMENT; IMPLICIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.019
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is commonly used to assess risky decision making in clinical and non-clinical populations, and negative mood and various personality characteristics have been shown to affect the number of advantageous and disadvantageous selections on this task. Recent research has suggested that IGT data should be analyzed at the individual deck level due to differences in frequency and magnitude of losses, and the present study examined how personality characteristics and state mood may affect deck level selections on this task. Participants were 91 undergraduate students (38 male) who completed measures of impulsivity and sensation seeking, behavioral activation and inhibition, state mood, and the computerized IGT. Results indicated that negative mood, drive, impulsivity, and sensation seeking were all positively correlated with Deck B selections, but negatively correlated with Deck D selections. No differences emerged in correlations between Decks A and B or Decks A and D. Results indicate that mood and personality characteristics differentially relate to selections from the individual decks on the IGT. Results have implications for the assessment of decision making, as personality and fluctuations in state-dependent mood could mimic pathological risk-taking if analysis is conducted on the combined decks. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 597
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is deck B a disadvantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task?
    Ching-Hung Lin
    Yao-Chu Chiu
    Po-Lei Lee
    Jen-Chuen Hsieh
    [J]. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3
  • [2] Is deck B a disadvantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task?
    Lin, Ching-Hung
    Chiu, Yao-Chu
    Lee, Po-Lei
    Hsieh, Jen-Chuen
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN FUNCTIONS, 2007, 3 (1)
  • [3] Is deck C an advantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task?
    Yao-Chu Chiu
    Ching-Hung Lin
    [J]. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3
  • [4] Is deck C an advantageous deck in the Iowa gambling task?
    Chiu, Yao-Chu
    Lin, Ching-Hung
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN FUNCTIONS, 2007, 3 (1)
  • [5] Affect and personality correlates of the Iowa Gambling Task
    Suhr, Julie A.
    Tsanadis, John
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 43 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [6] Risky Decision Making in Smoking and Nonsmoking College Students: Examination of Iowa Gambling Task Performance by Deck Type Selections
    Buelow, Melissa T.
    Suhr, Julie A.
    [J]. APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-CHILD, 2014, 3 (01) : 38 - 44
  • [7] Disadvantageous Deck Selection in the Iowa Gambling Task: The Effect of Cognitive Load
    Hawthorne, Melissa J.
    Pierce, Benton H.
    [J]. EUROPES JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 11 (02): : 335 - 348
  • [8] Personality and Skin Conductance Responses to Reward and Punishment Influence on the Iowa Gambling Task Performance
    Mardaga, Solange
    Hansenne, Michel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2012, 33 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [9] The influence of worry and avoidance on the Iowa Gambling Task
    Drost, Jolijn
    Spinhoven, Philip
    Kruijt, Anne-Wil
    Van der Does, Willem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 45 (01) : 74 - 80
  • [10] Influence of cognitive variables in the Iowa Gambling Task
    Gonzalez, G. Maria L.
    Ponce, J. Guillermo
    Diaz, F. Hugo M.
    Marino, D. Julian C.
    [J]. REVISTA ARGENTINA DE CIENCIAS DEL COMPORTAMIENTO, 2010, 2 (02): : 32 - 42