Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Radiation Therapy Outcomes: A Clinician's Perspective

被引:118
|
作者
Kang, John [1 ]
Schwartz, Russell [2 ]
Flickinger, John [3 ,4 ]
Beriwal, Sushil [3 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Univ Pittsburgh, Med Scientist Training Program, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Neurol Surg, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; RADIOTHERAPY OUTCOMES; TUMOR-CONTROL; DOSE-VOLUME; NTCP MODELS; PNEUMONITIS; CANCER; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.2286
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Radiation oncology has always been deeply rooted in modeling, from the early days of isoeffect curves to the contemporary Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) initiative. In recent years, medical modeling for both prognostic and therapeutic purposes has exploded thanks to increasing availability of electronic data and genomics. One promising direction that medical modeling is moving toward is adopting the same machine learning methods used by companies such as Google and Facebook to combat disease. Broadly defined, machine learning is a branch of computer science that deals with making predictions from complex data through statistical models. These methods serve to uncover patterns in data and are actively used in areas such as speech recognition, handwriting recognition, face recognition, "spam" filtering (junk email), and targeted advertising. Although multiple radiation oncology research groups have shown the value of applied machine learning (ML), clinical adoption has been slow due to the high barrier to understanding these complex models by clinicians. Here, we present a review of the use of ML to predict radiation therapy outcomes from the clinician's point of view with the hope that it lowers the "barrier to entry" for those without formal training in ML. We begin by describing 7 principles that one should consider when evaluating (or creating) an ML model in radiation oncology. We next introduce 3 popular ML methods-logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN)-and critique 3 seminal papers in the context of these principles. Although current studies are in exploratory stages, the overall methodology has progressively matured, and the field is ready for larger-scale further investigation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1127 / 1135
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting Football Match Outcomes With Machine Learning Approaches
    Choi B.S.
    Foo L.K.
    Chua S.-L.
    [J]. Mendel, 2023, 29 (02) : 229 - 236
  • [2] Machine Learning for Predicting Clinician Evaluation of Treatment Plans for Left-Sided Whole Breast Radiation Therapy
    Fiandra, Christian
    Cattani, Federica
    Leonardi, Maria Cristina
    Comi, Stefania
    Zara, Stefania
    Rossi, Linda
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
    Fariselli, Piero
    Ricardi, Umberto
    Heijmen, Ben
    [J]. ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 8 (05)
  • [3] Machine learning model for predicting outcomes of biologic therapy in psoriasis
    Du, Amy X.
    Ali, Zarqa
    Ajgeiy, Kawa K.
    Dalager, Maiken G.
    Dam, Tomas N.
    Egeberg, Alexander
    Nissen, Christoffer V. S.
    Skov, Lone
    Thomsen, Simon Francis
    Emam, Sepideh
    Gniadecki, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 88 (06) : 1364 - 1367
  • [4] Predicting Clinical Outcomes for Geriatric Patients after Radiation Therapy Treatment Using Artificial Intelligence (Machine Learning)
    Guest, D. S.
    Polce, S. A.
    Rana, Z. H.
    Bloom, B. F.
    Cao, Y.
    Potters, L.
    Parashar, B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E143 - E144
  • [5] A Comparison of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting the Progression of Crohn's Disease
    Hussain, Zain U.
    Comerford, Ragnor
    Comerford, Fynn
    Ng, Nathan
    Ng, Dominic
    Khan, Ateeb
    Lees, Charlie
    Hussain, Amir
    [J]. 2020 18TH IEEE STUDENT CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (SCORED), 2020, : 529 - 533
  • [6] MACHINE LEARNING FOR PREDICTING OUTCOMES IN TRAUMA
    Liu, Nehemiah T.
    Salinas, Jose
    [J]. SHOCK, 2017, 48 (05): : 504 - 510
  • [7] MACHINE LEARNING FOR PREDICTING OUTCOMES IN TRAUMA
    Liu, Nehemiah T.
    Serio-Melvin, Maria L.
    Salinas, Jose
    [J]. SHOCK, 2017, 47 (06): : 43 - 44
  • [8] Machine learning approaches in predicting allosteric sites
    Nerin-Fonz, Francho
    Cournia, Zoe
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2024, 85
  • [9] The Clinician's Guide to the Machine Learning Galaxy
    Shen, Lin
    Kann, Benjamin H.
    Taylor, R. Andrew
    Shung, Dennis L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [10] A Machine Learning Framework for Predicting the Tumor Control Probability of Radiation Therapy Plans
    Lee, E.
    Cao, Y.
    Templeton, A.
    Yao, R.
    Chu, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E619 - E620