Negative vascular remodelling after implantation of bioabsorbable magnesium alloy stents in porcine coronary arteries: a randomised comparison with bare-metal and sirolimus-eluting stents

被引:55
|
作者
Maeng, M. [1 ,2 ]
Jensen, L. O. [3 ]
Falk, E. [1 ,2 ]
Andersen, H. R. [1 ,2 ]
Thuesen, L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Skejby, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Inst Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Odense, Denmark
关键词
BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY; IN-VIVO; MODEL; INSIGHTS; INJURY;
D O I
10.1136/hrt.2007.139261
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: We sought to assess vascular remodelling and neointima formation after implantation of bioabsorbable magnesium alloy stents (AMS). Design: Randomised experimental study. Interventions: AMS (n = 11), sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher; n = 11) and bare-metal stents (BMS; n = 9) were randomly implanted in 31 porcine coronary arteries (n = 11 pigs). Main outcome measures: Neointima formation was measured by histomorphometry at 90 days. Vascular remodelling defined as change in external elastic membrane area from index intervention to follow-up was assessed by serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Results: By histomorphometry, lumen (median (quartiles); AMS: 1.75 mm(2) (1.07-3.26), Cypher 2.52 mm(2) (2.22-5.01), BMS 4.55 mm(2) (3.2-7.44); p = 0.013) and external elastic membrane area (AMS: 5.56 mm(2) (4.09-6.95), Cypher 7.95 mm(2) (6.45-10.92), BMS 9.08 mm(2) (7.85-11.63); p = 0.014) were smallest after AMS implantation. By IVUS, external elastic membrane area at follow-up was smallest (AMS: 7.5 (2.8) mm(2), Cypher 9.1 (2.7) mm(2), BMS 9.9 (3.1) mm(2); p = 0.33) and change in external elastic membrane area from index intervention to follow-up (remodelling; AMS: 21.0 (3.1) mm(2), Cypher 1.0 (0.8) mm(2), BMS 0.9 (1.2) mm(2); p = 0.30) was greatest in the AMS group. In a dichotomised IVUS assessment of vascular remodelling, six AMS stents were remodelled (negative remodelling: n = 5; positive remodelling: n = 1) at 90-day follow-up (AMS versus Cypher + BMS: p = 0.001). Neointima formation was smallest in the AMS group (p < 0.05 for both histomorphometry and IVUS). Conclusion: Coronary implantation of absorbable magnesium stents, compared to two non-absorbable stents, was associated with the smallest lumen area at three-month follow-up because of negative vascular remodelling.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 246
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Yellow plaques remain after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: Angioscopic comparison with bare-metal stents
    Awata, Masaki
    Uematsu, Masaaki
    Kotani, Jun-ichi
    Morozumi, Takakazu
    Watanabe, Telsuya
    Onishi, Toshinari
    Iida, Osamu
    Sera, Fusako
    Minamiguchi, Hitoshi
    Akahori, Hirokuni
    Yano, Masamichi
    Tanaka, Nobuaki
    Yasui, Haruyo
    Ikeoka, Kuniyasu
    Okamoto, Shin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 100 (8A): : 21L - 21L
  • [2] Sirolimus-eluting stents are not cost-effective compared with bare-metal stents
    Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine, 2007, 4 (4): : 178 - 179
  • [3] A pooled analysis of data comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents
    Spaulding, Christian
    Daemen, Joost
    Boersma, Eric
    Cutlip, Donald E.
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (10): : 989 - 997
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents
    Caroline Barranco
    Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine, 2005, 2 (9): : 439 - 439
  • [5] Comparing the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents and common bare-metal stents
    Nazeri, I
    Nazeri, A
    Shokoufi-Moghiman, S
    Hashemy, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (8A): : 46A - 46A
  • [6] Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents in Routine Clinical Use A Nonrandomized Comparison
    Munir, Muhammad
    Aliota, Jonathan
    Ahmed, Amany
    Mohammed, Anwarullah
    Lee, Vei Vei
    Elayda, MacArthur A.
    Wilson, James M.
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 2011, 38 (05) : 508 - 515
  • [7] Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents
    Kastrati, Adnan
    Mehilli, Julinda
    Pache, Juergen
    Kaiser, Christoph
    Valgimigli, Marco
    Kelbaek, Henning
    Menichelli, Maurizio
    Sabate, Manel
    Suttorp, Maarten J.
    Baumgart, Dietrich
    Seyfarth, Melchior
    Pfisterer, Matthias E.
    Schoemig, Albert
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (10): : 1030 - 1039
  • [8] Angioscopic comparison of coronary artery healing process through a decade after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents and bare metal stents
    Ichikawa, M.
    Kijima, Y.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 304 - 304
  • [9] Outcomes of Overlapping Bare-Metal Stents with Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Long Lesions in Small Coronary Vessels
    Kronsteiner, Emily
    Lee, Richard W.
    Sweeney, John P.
    Metallo, Jennifer R.
    Stoehr, James D.
    Fortuin, F. David
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 22 (02): : 76 - 79
  • [10] Outcomes of bare-metal stents implanted simultaneously with sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher) in multivessel coronary artery disease patients: Evaluation of systemic effects of sirolimus-eluting stents
    Kang, TS
    Yoon, YW
    Hong, BK
    Kwon, HM
    Cho, SY
    Kim, HS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (8A): : 42A - 42A