Expression of Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule in Paired Tumor Samples of Patients With Primary and Recurrent Serous Ovarian Cancer

被引:12
|
作者
Pietzner, Klaus [1 ]
Woopen, Hannah [1 ]
Richter, Rolf [1 ]
Joens, Thomas [2 ]
Braicu, Elena Ioana [1 ]
Dimitrova, Desislava [1 ]
Mellstedt, Hakan [3 ]
Darb-Esfahani, Silvia [4 ]
Denkert, Carsten [4 ]
Lindhofer, Horst [5 ]
Fotopoulou, Christina [1 ]
Sehouli, Jalid [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Campus Virchow Klinikum, European Competence Ctr Ovarian Canc, Dept Gynecol, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite, Charite Campus Mitte, Ctr Anat, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Canc Ctr Karolinska, Dept Oncol, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Charite, Charite Campus Mitte, Inst Pathol, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[5] TRION Res GmbH, Martinsried, Germany
关键词
EpCAM expression; Ovarian cancer; Recurrence; Prognosis; Survival; ANTIBODY CATUMAXOMAB; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; EPCAM EXPRESSION; BREAST-CANCER; EP-CAM; OVEREXPRESSION; CARCINOMA; ANTIGEN; GLYCOPROTEIN; ADECATUMUMAB;
D O I
10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182929056
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Ovarian cancer (OC) recurrence constitutes a therapeutic dilemma with various novel targeted agents emerging that offer alternative treatment options. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) expression profiles in paired tumor samples of patients with OC relapse. Methods: EpCAM expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry using the avidin-biotin- complex method on paraffin-embedded OC tissues obtained at primary surgery as well as on corresponding tumor samples of the same patients at relapse. The EpCAM overexpression was defined as 76% to 100% of tumor cells positively stained for EpCAM. Clinical data were collected within the Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network. Results: Nineteen patients with serous OC histology were included in the study (median age at primary diagnosis, 50 years; range, 40-74 years). The majority of the patients (95%) presented with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III/IV, and 68.4% of the tumors were poorly differentiated. A complete macroscopic tumor resection could be achieved in 15 patients (78.9%) at diagnosis. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule overexpression was detected in 17 (89%) of the primary and 16 (84%) of the recurrent tumors (P = 1.0); hence, no significant change of the EpCAM expression profile could be identified over time. Conclusions: Epithelial cell adhesion molecule expression profile appears to remain stable during the course from the primary throughout the relapse of serous OC. The results indicate that EpCAM might be an interesting therapeutic target structure in serous OC.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / 802
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic significance of paired epithelial cell adhesion molecule and E-cadherin in ovarian serous carcinoma
    Shim, Hyo Sup
    Yoon, Bo Sung
    Cho, Nam Hoon
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2009, 40 (05) : 693 - 698
  • [2] Analysis and Comparison of Somatic Mutations in Paired Primary and Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Samples
    Kim, Yong-Man
    Lee, Shin-Wha
    Chun, Sung-Min
    Kim, Dae-Yeon
    Kim, Jong-Hyeok
    Kim, Kyu-Rae
    Kim, Young-Tak
    Nam, Joo-Hyun
    van Hummelen, Paul
    MacConaill, Laura E.
    Hahn, William C.
    Jang, Se Jin
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06):
  • [3] Overexpression of Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule in Primary, Metastatic, and Recurrent/Chemotherapy-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Implications for Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-Specific Immunotherapy
    Bellone, Stefania
    Siegel, Eric R.
    Cocco, Emiliano
    Cargnelutti, Marilisa
    Silasi, Dan-Arin
    Azodi, Masoud
    Schwartz, Peter E.
    Rutherford, Thomas J.
    Pecorelli, Sergio
    Santin, Alessandro D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2009, 19 (05) : 860 - 866
  • [4] Prognostic value of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) in patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Woopen, Hannah
    Pietzner, Klaus
    Richter, Rolf
    Fotopoulou, Christina
    Joens, Thomas
    Braicu, Ioana
    Mellstedt, Hakan
    Darb-Esfahani, Silvia
    Denkert, Carsten
    Sehouli, Jalid
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [5] Prognostic impact of epithelial cell adhesion molecule in ovarian cancer patients
    Lee, Maria
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (04) : 352 - 353
  • [6] Identification of epithelial cell adhesion molecule autoantibody in patients with ovarian cancer
    Kim, JH
    Herlyn, D
    Wong, KK
    Park, DC
    Schorge, JO
    Lu, KH
    Skates, SJ
    Cramer, DW
    Berkowitz, RS
    Mok, SC
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2003, 9 (13) : 4782 - 4791
  • [7] GENOMIC SCAR ANALYSIS IN PAIRED PRIMARY AND RECURRENT HIGH-GRADE SEROUS OVARIAN CANCER
    Vanderstichele, A.
    Castillo-Tong, D. Cacsire
    Busschaert, P.
    Olbrecht, S.
    Van Nieuwenhuysen, E.
    Han, S.
    Concin, N.
    Neven, P.
    Berns, E.
    Braicu, I.
    Sehouli, J.
    Kreuzinger, C.
    Zeillinger, R.
    Smeets, D.
    Lambrechts, D.
    Vergote, I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 1823 - 1823
  • [8] GENOMIC SCAR ANALYSIS IN PAIRED PRIMARY AND RECURRENT HIGH-GRADE SEROUS OVARIAN CANCER
    Vanderstichele, A.
    Castillo-Tong, D. Cacsire
    Busschaert, P.
    Olbrecht, S.
    Van Nieuwenhuysen, E.
    Han, S.
    Concin, N.
    Neven, P.
    Berns, E.
    Braicu, I.
    Sehouli, J.
    Kreuzinger, C.
    Zeillinger, R.
    Smeets, D.
    Lambrechts, D.
    Vergote, I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 582 - 582
  • [9] Claudin-6 expression in primary and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: A potential therapeutic target for high-grade serous ovarian cancer
    Shintani, D.
    Hanaoka, M.
    Komats, T.
    Yano, M.
    Yabuno, A.
    Yagishita, S.
    Yasuda, M.
    Nagata, M.
    Hasegawa, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S581 - S582
  • [10] Prognostic impact of epithelial cell adhesion molecule in ovarian cancer patients Reply to M Lee
    Woopen, Hannah
    Pietzner, Klaus
    Sehouli, Jalid
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (04) : 354 - 354