Canine brainstem auditory evoked responses are not clinically impacted by head size or breed

被引:9
|
作者
Kemper, Debra L. [1 ,2 ]
Scheifele, Peter M. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Clark, John Greer [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, FETCH LAB, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Lab Anim Med Serv, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Med Ctr, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Coll Allied Hlth Sci, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Med Ctr, Dept Med Educ, Sch Med, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[5] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
关键词
Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response (BAER); Canine hearing assessment; Breed; Canine head size; Canine deafness; Canine BAER standardized testing parameters; CONGENITAL DEAFNESS; HEARING; DOGS; POTENTIALS; LATENCY; GENDER; AGE; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.12.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Accurate assessment of canine hearing is essential to decrease the incidence of hereditary deafness in predisposed breeds and to substantiate hearing acuity. The Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response (BAER) is a widely accepted, objective test used in humans and animals for estimation of hearing thresholds and deafness diagnosis. In contrast to humans, testing and recording parameters for determination of normal values for canine hearing are not available. Conflicting information concerning breed and head size effects on canine BAER tests are major contributors preventing this normalization. The present study utilized standard head measurement techniques coupled with BAER testing and recording parameters modeled from humans to examine the effect canine head size and breed have on BAER results. Forty-three adult dogs from fourteen different breeds had head size measurements and BAER tests performed. The mean latencies compared by breed for waves I, II, III, IV, and V were as follows: 1.46 +/- 0.49 ms, 2.52 +/- 0.54 ms, 3.45 +/- 0.41 ms, 4.53 +/- 0.83 ms and 5.53 +/- 0.43 ms, respectively. The mean wave I-V latency interval for all breeds was 3.69 ms. All dogs showed similar waveform morphology, structures, including the presence of five waves occurring within 11 ms after stimulus presentation and a significant trough occurring after Wave V. All of the waveform morphology for our subjects occurred with consistent interpeak latencies as shown by statistical testing. All animals had diagnostic results within the expected ranges for each wave latency and interwave interval allowing diagnostic evaluation. Our results establish that neither differences in head size nor breed impact determination of canine BAER waveform morphology, latency, or healing sensitivity for diagnostic purposes. The differences in canine head size do not have a relevant impact on canine BAERs and are not clinically pertinent to management or diagnostic decisions. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 197
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MRI measurement of the canine auditory pathways and relationship with brainstem auditory evoked responses
    Poma, R.
    Chambers, H.
    da Costa, R. C.
    Konyer, N. B.
    Nykamp, S.
    Dobson, H.
    Milgram, N. W.
    VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2008, 21 (03) : 238 - 242
  • [2] The effect of cochlear size on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in deaf children
    Zhu, Han-Yu
    Sun, Jia-Qiang
    Sun, Jing-Wu
    Guo, Xiao-Tao
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 8 (02): : 532 - 537
  • [3] Brainstem auditory evoked responses in primary hypertension
    Tandon, OP
    Ram, D
    Awasthi, R
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1996, 104 : 311 - 315
  • [4] Brainstem auditory evoked responses in patients with tinnitus
    Lemaire, MC
    Beutter, P
    AUDIOLOGY, 1995, 34 (06): : 287 - 300
  • [5] Brainstem auditory evoked responses elicited by tone-burst stimuli in clinically normal dogs
    Uzuka, Y
    Fukaki, M
    Hara, Y
    Matsumoto, H
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 12 (01) : 22 - 25
  • [6] Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response (BAER) in Canine Otitis Externa
    Karnad, V. V.
    Jeyaraja, K.
    Jayathangaraj, M. G.
    Jayanthy, C.
    Bhave, K.
    Vijayarani, K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2021, 55 (02) : 236 - 239
  • [7] Modeling auditory evoked brainstem responses to transient stimuli
    Ronne, Filip Munch
    Dau, Torsten
    Harte, James
    Elberling, Claus
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 131 (05): : 3903 - 3913
  • [8] Correlation of opioid dependence with brainstem auditory evoked responses
    Lal, Rakesh
    Bhatt, Ajay Kumar
    Bhatia, Manvir
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 55 (05) : S80 - S80
  • [9] Auditory Brainstem Evoked Responses in Newborns With Down Syndrome
    Kittler, Phyllis M.
    Phan, Ha T. T.
    Gardner, Judith M.
    Miroshnichenko, Inna
    Gordon, Anne
    Karmel, Bernard Z.
    AJIDD-AMERICAN JOURNAL ON INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2009, 114 (06): : 393 - 400
  • [10] Steady-state auditory evoked responses in audiological diagnosis in children: a comparison with brainstem evoked auditory responses
    Ivo Rodrigues, Gabriela Ribeiro
    Lewis, Doris Ruth
    Fichino, Silvia Napole
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 76 (01) : 96 - 101