An Investigation of Examinee Test-Taking Effort on a Large-Scale Assessment

被引:54
|
作者
Setzer, J. Carl [1 ]
Wise, Steven L. [2 ]
van den Heuvel, Jill R. [3 ]
Ling, Guangming [3 ]
机构
[1] GED Testing Serv, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Northwest Evaluat Assoc, Portland, OR USA
[3] Educ Testing Serv, Princeton, NJ USA
关键词
RAPID-GUESSING BEHAVIOR; RESPONSE-TIME; MOTIVATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/08957347.2013.739453
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Assessment results collected under low-stakes testing situations are subject to effects of low examinee effort. The use of computer-based testing allows researchers to develop new ways of measuring examinee effort, particularly using response times. At the item level, responses can be classified as exhibiting either rapid-guessing behavior or solution behavior based on the item response time. Most previous research involving the study of response times has been conducted using locally developed instruments. The purpose of the current study was to examine the amount of rapid-guessing behavior within a commercially available, low-stakes instrument. Results indicate that smaller amounts of rapid-guessing behavior exist within the data compared to published results using other instruments. Additionally, rapid-guessing behavior varied by item and was significantly related to item length, item position, and presence of ancillary reading material. The amount of rapid-guessing behavior was consistently very low among various demographic subpopulations. On average, rapid-guessing behavior was observed on only 1% of item responses. Also found was that a small amount of rapid-guessing behavior can impact institutional rankings.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 49
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying low test-taking effort during low-stakes tests with the new Test-taking Effort Short Scale (TESS) - development and psychometrics
    Schuettpelz-Brauns, Katrin
    Kadmon, Martina
    Kiessling, Claudia
    Karay, Yassin
    Gestmann, Margarita
    Kaemmer, Juliane E.
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 18
  • [2] Identifying low test-taking effort during low-stakes tests with the new Test-taking Effort Short Scale (TESS) – development and psychometrics
    Katrin Schüttpelz-Brauns
    Martina Kadmon
    Claudia Kiessling
    Yassin Karay
    Margarita Gestmann
    Juliane E. Kämmer
    BMC Medical Education, 18
  • [3] Incorporating Test-Taking Engagement into Multistage Adaptive Testing Design for Large-Scale Assessments
    Bulut, Okan
    Gorgun, Guher
    Karamese, Hacer
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2023,
  • [4] Between- versus Within-Examinee Variability in Test-Taking Effort and Test Emotions during a Low-Stakes Test
    Perkins, Beth A.
    Pastor, Dena A.
    Finney, Sara J.
    APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2021, 34 (04) : 285 - 300
  • [5] Student characteristics and effort during test-taking
    Borghans, Lex
    Diris, Ron
    Tavares, Mariana
    LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2024, 93
  • [6] Person misfit, test anxiety, and test-taking motivation in a large-scale mathematics proficiency test for self-evaluation
    Spoden, Christian
    Fleischer, Jens
    Frey, Andreas
    STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2020, 67
  • [7] Conversation-based assessment: A novel approach to boosting test-taking effort in digital formative assessment
    Yildirim-Erbasli S.N.
    Bulut O.
    Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 4
  • [8] Item Position Effects Are Moderated by Changes in Test-Taking Effort
    Weirich, Sebastian
    Hecht, Martin
    Penk, Christiane
    Roppelt, Alexander
    Boehme, Katrin
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2017, 41 (02) : 115 - 129
  • [9] An exploration of the psychology of the examinee: Can examinee self-regulation and test-taking motivation predict consequential and non-consequential test performance?
    Sundre, DL
    Kitsantas, A
    CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 29 (01) : 6 - 26
  • [10] The Emotional Regulation during Test-taking scale
    Schutz, PA
    Distefano, C
    Benson, J
    Davis, HA
    ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2004, 17 (03): : 253 - 269